Petunjuk Praktikum Struktur dan Fungsi Tumbuhan untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Bepikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP

Neni Hasnunidah, Undang Rosidin, Nina Kadaritna


The purpose of  this research measures the validity and effectiveness of practical guide on the structure and function plant and the key that has been developed based on the Argument-Driven Inquiry Models. This research use 4-D models that are developed by Thiagarajan namely Design, Define, Develop, and Disseminate. The result of the research shows that the practical guide is proper to use as learning resource that validity average is 97% are considered theoretically feasible and student response average is 88% are considered very good. Improvement of critical thinking skill is shown with gain score of 0,40.


practical guide, argument-driven inquiry, critical thinking skills

Full Text:



National Education Association. 2012. Preparing 21st century students for a global society an educator’s guide to the “four Cs”.

Domin, D. S. (1999). A Review Of Laboratory Instruction Styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), , 543–547.

Ennis, R. (2001). Critical Thinking Assesment. Theory into Practice, 32(3):179-186.

Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990 ). Promoting Conceptual Change in The Laboratory. In E.Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The Student Laboratory and the Science Curriculum(pp. 159–182). London: Routledge.

Hake, R. R. (1998 ). Interactive-Engagement Vs Traditional Methods; A Six- Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanic Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.

Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is This Purpose of This Experiment?or Can Students Learn Something from Doing Experiments? . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(655-675).

Hart, D. (1994). Authentic Assesment A Hand Book for Educators. . California. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Hofstein, A. (2004). The Laboratory in Chemistry Education: Thirty Years of Experience with Developments, Implementation, and Evaluation.Chemistry Education:Research and Practice in Europe (CERP), 5(3), 247-264.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1) 28-54.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research. Review of Education Research, 52 (2), 201-217.

Kadayifcia, H., Atasoya, B., & Akussa, H. (2012). The Correlation Between The Flaws Students Define in Argument and Their Creative and Critical Thinking Abilities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 802-806.

Keraf, G. (2007). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kim, H., & Song, J. (2005 ). The Features of Peer Argumentation in Middle School Student’s Scientific Inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 211-233.

Marttunen, M. (1994. ). Assessing Argumentation Skills Among Finnish University Students. Learning and Instruction,, 4 (94), 175-191.

Mudjito. (2015). Pembinaan Minat Baca. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Munandar, K. (2016). Pengenalan Laboratorium IPA-Biologi Sekolah. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Prastowo, A. (2012). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. . Yogjakarta: Diva Press.

Pratisto, A. (2004). Cara Mudah Mengatasi Masalah Statistik dan Rancangan Percobaan dengan SPSS 12. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Quitadamo, I. J., Faiola, C. L., Johnson, J. E., & Kurtz, M. J. (2008 ). Community Based Inquiry Improves Critical Thinking in General Education Biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(3), 327-337.

Sagala, S. (2005). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV. Alvabeta.

Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009 ). Argument-Driven Inquiry to Promote the Understanding of Important Concepts & Practices in Biology.The American Biology Teacher,71 (8), 465-472.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Enderle, P., & Southerland. (2012, 25th March ). Using Laboratory Activities that Emphasize Argumentation and Argument to Help High School Students Learn How to Engage in Scientific Practices and Understand the Nature of Scientific Inquiry. Paper presented at the the Annual International Conference Of The National Association For Research In Science Teaching (NARST), Baltimore.

Sampson, V. E., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments, an Exploratory Study. Science Education Journal, 95, 217 - 257

Scafersman, S. D. (1991). An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Retrieved from

Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem Based Learning Innovation. Using Problem to Power Learning in the 21st Century. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte. Ltd.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional Development forTraining Teachers of Exceptional Children. Blomington: Central for Innovation on Teaching the Handicapped.

Wisudawati, A. W., & Sulistyowati, E. (2014). Metodologi Pembelajaran IPA. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.


  • There are currently no refbacks.