Pengaruh Brainstorming Activity dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa

Karina Tia Prastika, Sri Dwiastuti, Dewi Puspita Sari

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know the effect of brainstorming actvity in Learning Cycle 5E learning model towards sciencetific literacy ability aspect of scientific nomenclature, rules of scientific evidence, postulate of science, scientific disposition, major misconception about science and, intellectual process skills. The research method is experimental research with Randomized Posttest-Only Control Group Design. The research population is all students of class XI IPA SMA Negeri 2 Karanganyar. The sample of research choosed with simple ramdom sampling technique and obtained two classes namely class XI IPA 4 as experiment class and XI IPA 1 as control class. Data collection techniques use tests and observations. Normality and homogeneity test are performed as a requirement of hypothesis test. The data analysis technique used Manova test and advanced testing using Tukey test.The research procedure includes planning, implementation and data analysis.Based on the result of the research, it can be concluded thatthere is effect of brainstorming actvity in Learning Cycle 5E learning model towards sciencetific literacy ability on aspect of scientific nomenclature, rules of scientific evidence, postulate of science, scientific disposition, major misconception about science and, intellectual process skills. The effect of brainstorming actvity in Learning Cycle 5E learning model on aspects of sciencetific literacy ability from highest to lowest is scientific disposition more than postulate of science, scientific nomenclatur equal to postulate of science, then major misconception about science and intellectual process skills.

Keywords

brainstorming activity; Learning Cycle 5E; scientific literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aunurrahman. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language learning, 59(s1), 1-26.

Budprom, W., Suksringam, P., & Singsriwo, A. (2010). Effects of learning environmental education using the 5E-Learning Cycle with multiple intelligences and teacher’s handbook approaches on learning achievement, basic science process skills and critical thinking of grade 9 students. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 200-204.

Delcourt, M. A., & McKinnon, J. (2011). Tools for inquiry: Improving questioning in the classroom. Learning Landscapes, 4(2), 145-159.

Fajaroh, F., & Dasna, I. W. (2008). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Malang: Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang.

Hagerman, C. L. (2012). Effects of the 5E Learning Cycle on student content comprehension and scientific literacy.

Haribhai, T. S., & Dhirenkumar, G. P. (2012). Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness of Computer-Aided Instruction Method. Quest-The Journal of UGC-ASC Nainital, 6(3), 479-488.

Hayat, B., dan S. Yusuf. (2010). Benchmark Internasional Mutu Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Jossey, Bass. (2008). Brainstorming-Pfeiffer. The Pfeiffer Library Volume 26, 2nd Edition.

Mabsuthoh, N. (2010). Pengeruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Pada Konsep Massa Jenis. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Melati, H.A. (2010). Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA N 1 Sungai Ambawang Melalui Pembelajaran Model Advance Organizer Berlatar Numbered Heads Togehther (NHT) pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan. Pendidikan MIPA FKIP-UNTAN Pontianak.

Nur’aini, D., Rahardjo, S. B., & Vh, E. S. (2017). Analisis Buku Ajar Kimia Kelas Xi Pada Materi Termokimia Di Kota Surakarta Berdasarkan Muatan Literasi Sains. In Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains) (pp. 254-259).

Novitasari, C., Ramli, M., Ariyanto, J., & Darmiyati, E. S. (2016, January). The Implementation of Inquiry Learning with Brainstorming Activity to Improve Intrinsic Motivation of Students of Grade XI MIA 4 SMA Negeri 1 Sragen. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 441-445).

OECD. (2009). A Framework for PISA: Assessing Scientific, Reading, and Mathematical Literacy: OECD Publishing.

Qarareh, A. O. (2012). The Effect of using the Learning Cycle method in teaching science on the educational achievement of the sixth graders. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 123-132.

Rizkita L., Suwono, H., & Susilo. H. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains Siswa Sma Kota Malang. Seminar Nasional II Kerjasama Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan dan Kependudukan (PSLK) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Rosalita, S. (2011). Peningkatan Aktivitas Belajar Siswa Menngunakan Metode Demonstrasi Pembelajaran IPA Disekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(12).

Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137-1160.

Sardiman, A.M. (2012). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta; PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun literasi sains peserta didik.Bandung: Humaniora.

Tuna, A., & Kacar, A. (2013). The effect of 5E Learning Cycle model in teaching trigonometry on students’ academic achievement and the permanence of their knowledge. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(1), 73-87.

Turiman P., Omar J., Daud A M., & Osman K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia –Social and Behavioral Sciences59 (2012) 110-116.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116.

Wena, M. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Kontemporer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Wenning, C. J. (2006). A Framework for Teaching the Nature of Science. Journal Physics Teacher Education, 3-10.

Wibowo, A. (2010). Penerapan Pembelajaran Dengan Teknik Probing Dalam Kelompok Kecil Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuankomunikasi Pada Siswa (PTK Pembelajaran Matematika Di Kelas VII D MTs Negeri Sukoharjo Pada Pokok Bahasan Pecahan) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Wilis Dahar, R. (1996). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Zarif, T., & Mateen, A. (2013). Role Of Using Brainstorming On Student Learning Outcomes During Teaching Of Studies at Middle Level. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business, 4(9).

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.