Pembelajaran Lingkungan melalui Pengembangan Subjek Spesifik Pedagogi Berbasis Problem Based Learning untuk Menguatkan Literasi Lingkungan Siswa Kelas X MIA SMA

Windi Mega Widianingsih, Puguh karyanto, Baskoro adi prayitno

Abstract

The research aims to know about the characteristics, feasibility, and effectiveness of subject specific pedagogy equipment based on PBL to reinforce students environmental literacy in grade X MIA Senior High School. Research conducted by research and development SSP based on PBL. Design of research was using the 3D Model which has been modified from 4D model by Thiagarajan & Stolovitch. The research model consist of define, design and develop, while disseminate phase wasn’t use in this research. The analysis of data consist of needs analysis, validation data analysis, limited trial test analysis, subject test analysis, and environmental literacy. Environmental literacy analysis used the normality test, homogenity test, and non paired samples ttest. This research give three kinds of result. First, the characteristic of  SSP equipment based on PBL was integrated with New Ecological Paradigm dimention and was developed by PBL steps. Second, feasibility based on validation result from expert judgments and user showed that 92,5% in RPP (valid), 87,97 % in module (valid), 88,33 % in LKS (valid) and 90 % in evaluation question (valid). The result of limited trial test from student and teacher showed that 91,15 % in modul (valid) and 87,49 in LKS (valid). The result  of subject test showed that 91,69% in module (valid) and 89,04% in LKS (valid). SSP equipment based on PBL was valid to use for environmental learned in X MIA class. Third, SSP based on PBL effectively to reinforce environmental literacy consist of knowledge, attitude, and concern aspect. Effectiveness test showed that significance was smaller than α (sig. < 0,05) that meant there was differences between result of student’s environmental literacy with learning used SSP based on PBL and without SSP based on PBL.
Keywords

Keywords

environmental literacy, problem based learning, research and development, subject spesific pedagogy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-dajeh, H. L. (2011). Assessing Environmental Literacy of Pre-Vocational Education Teachers in Jordan. College Student Journal, 46(3), 492–507. Amburgey, J. W., & Thoman, D. (2012). Dimensionality of the New Ecological Paradigm: Issues of Factor Structure and Measurement. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 235–256. Anwar, Y., Rustaman, N. Y., & Widodo, A. (2013). Kemampuan Subject Spesifik Pedagogy Calon Guru Biologi Peserta Program Pendidikan Profesional Guru (PPG) yang Berlatar Belakang Basic Sains Pra dan Post Workshop. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 157–162. Asyhar, R. (2012). Kreatif Mengembangkan Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Referensi Jakarta. Atmojo, S. E. (2013). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Pengelolaan Lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 43(2), 134–143. Damayanti, D. S., & Ngazizah, N. (2013). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) dengan Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Mengoptimalkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Pada Materi Listrik Dinamis SMA Negeri 3 Purworejo Kelas X Tahun Pelajaran 2012 / 2013. Radiasi, 3(1), 58–62. Dunlap, R. E., Liere, K. D. Van, Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm : A Revised NEP Scale. Jurnal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran (Mengajarkan Konten dan Keterampilan Berpikir). Jakarta: Indeks. Erdogan, M., & Ok, A. (2011). An Assessment of Turkish Young Pupils’ Environmental Literacy: A Nationwide Survey. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2375–2406. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.550653 Esa, N. (2010). Environmental Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Student Teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 19(1), 39–50. http://doi.org/10.1080/10382040903545534 Fajar, J. (2014). Laporan WWF Setengah Keanekaragaman Hayati Dunia Hilang. Retrieved December 28, 2016 from http://www.mongabay.co.id/2014/09/30/laporanwwf-setengah-keanekaragaman-hayati-dunia-hilang/ Fuad, M., & Wilujeng, I. (2016). Pengembangan SSP Zat dan Energi Berbasis Keunggulan Lokal untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains dan Kepedulian Lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(1), 66– 75. Haske, A. S., & Wulan, A. R. (2015). Pengembangan Elearning Berbasis MOODLE dalam Pembelajaran Ekosistem untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Lingkungan Siswa pada Program Pengayaan. In Prosiding Seminar Biologi, Sains, Lingkungan, dan Pembelajarannya. Surakarta: FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret. Husna, S. (2013). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning pada Konsep Perusakan dan Pencemaran Lingkungan untuk Meningkatkan Sikap Peduli Lingkungan Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Sabang. Jurnal EduBio Tropika, 1(2), 97–100. Indriawati, A., Susilowati, S. M. E., & Supardi, K. I. (2016). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Bahan Ajar Berorientasi Sumberdaya Perairan Terhadap Karakter Peduli Lingkungan dan Hasil Belajar IPA. Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 88–96. Istikomayanti, Y., Suwono, H., & Irawati, M. H. (2016). Pembelajaran Eksperiensial Group Investigation (GI) Sebagai Upaya Mengembangkan Kemampuan Literasi Lingkungan Siswa Kelas IV MI. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 2(1), 57–71. Kumurur, V. A. (2008). Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Kepedulian Mahasiswa Pascasrjana Ilmu Lingkungan Terhadap Lingkungan Hidup Kota Jakarta. Ekoton, 8(2), 1–24. Landriany, E. (2014). Implementasi Kebijakan Adiwiyata Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup di SMA Kota Malang. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 2(1), 82–88. Listiawati, N. (2013). Pelaksaan Pendidikan untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan oleh Beberapa Lembaga. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 19(3), 430–450. Mulyana, R. (2009). Penanaman Etika Lingkungan Melalui Sekolah Perduli dan Berbudaya Lingkungan. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS UNIMED, 6(2), 175–180. Ozsoy, S., Ertepinar, H., & Saglam, N. (2012). Can EcoSchools Improve Elementary School Students ’ Environmental Literacy Levels ? Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 1–25. Pe’er, S., Goldman, D., & Yavetz, B. (2007). Environmental Literacy in Teacher Training: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Environmental Behavior of Beginning Students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), 45– 59. http://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.1.45-59 Reis, G., Guimaraes-iosif, R., & Reis, J. (2009). Media and Environmental Literacy : Making School Relevant. Leituras Transdisciplinares de Telas E Textos , Belo Horizonte, 5(9), 26–40. http://doi.org/10.17851/18098150.5.9.26-40 Saribas, D. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between Pre- Service Teachers ’ Scientific Literacy, Environmental Literacy and Life-Long Learning Tendency. Science Education, 26(1), 80–100. Sutarno. (2015). Makalah Utama : Biodiversitas Indonesia : Penurunan dan Upaya Pengelolaan untuk Menjamin Kemandirian bangsa. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indon, 1(1), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.13057/psnmbi/m010101 Tan, O. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation:Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Singapore: Thomson Learning. Tan, O. (2007). Problem-Based Learning Pedagogies : Psychological Processes and Enhancement of Intelligences. Educ Res Policy Prac, 6, 101–114. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-007-9014-1 Thiagarajan, S., & Stolovitch, H. (1997). Evaluation of A Mediated Program For Training Teachers of Exceptional Children In Instructional Development. Blomington: Indiana University. Tivani, I. (2016). Pengembangan LKS Biologi Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(1), 35–45. Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Kaplowitz, M. (2009). Assessing PreService Teachers’ Environmental Literacy in Turkey As a Mean to Develop Teacher Education Programs. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 426–436. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.