Penerapan Instruksi pada Tahap Hypothesis Generation dalam Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menemukan dan Menghubungkan Konsep

Faizal Nur As’ari, Sri Widoretno, Nurmiyati Nurmiyati

Abstract

The research aims to increase the ability to find and connect concepts through implementation of instructions in hypothesis generation phase of discovery learning. This research is classroom action research that carried out for 2 cycles. Subjects are 28 students of high school students. The procedure of research consists: planning, observation, action, and reflection. Data were collected through observations, tests, documentation, and interviews. Validity of the data is performed using triangulation method. Data analysis using data reduction, data presentation, and inference with the qualitative descriptive analysis. The results showed the ability to find and connect a concept based on score of concept map in the pre cycle is range 2.84% - 5.41%. The average score of concept map in pre cycle is 3.46% with 12 students above average. The cycle I identified a score of concept map is range 5.8%-35.8%. The average score of concept map in the cycle I is 13.87% with 9 students above average. The cycle II identified a score of concept map is range 3.4% score-44.4%. The average score of concept map in cycle II is 18.3% with 16 students above the average, thus the ability to find and connect a concept based on range and an average score of concept map learners increased from pre cycle to cycle II, although the number of learners who is increasing is fluctuative.

Keywords

Instruction, hypothesis generation, discovery learning, find concept, connect concept

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afrilianto. (2012). Peningkatan pemahaman konsep

dan kompetensi strategis matematis siswa smp

dengan pendekatan metaphorical thinking.

Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP

Siliwangi Bandung,1(2), 192–202.

Asan, A. (2007). Concept mapping in science class: A

case study of fifth grade students. Educational

Technology and Society, 10(1), 186–195.

Erawanto, U. (2013). Pengaruh Konstruktivisme

Dalam Pembelajaran, 15.

Joolingen, W. Van. (2007). Cognitive tools for

discovery learning, 385–397.

Kahmann, R. (2016). The Ability of the Inquiry Skills

Test to Predict Students ’ Performance on

Hypothesis Generation, (July).

Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search

during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science,

(1), 1–48.

Liu, S., & Lee, G. (2013). Computers & Education

Using a concept map knowledge management

system to enhance the learning of biology, 68,

–116.

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010).

Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and

does it matter? Results from a research synthesis

years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.

Novak, J. D., & Cañas, a J. (2008). The Theory

Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct

and Use Them. IHMC CmapTools, 1–36.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T.,

van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T.,Tsourlidaki, E.

(2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational

Research Review, 14, 47–61.

Radford, J., Bosanquet, P., Webster, R., & Blatchford,

P. (2015). Scaffolding learning for

independence: Clarifying teacher and teaching

assistant roles for children with special

educational needs. Learning and Instruction, 36,

–10.

Saab, N., Joolingen, W. R. Van, & Hout-wolters, B.

H. A. M. Van. (2005). Communication in

collaborative discovery learning. British Journal

of Educational Psychology, 75, 603–621.

Sutman, F. X., Schmuckler, J. S., & Woodfield, J. D.

(2008). The Science Quest Using

Inquiry/Discovery to Enhance Student Learning,

Grades 7–12.

Tampubolon. (2014). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.

Jakarta: Erlangga.

Veerman. (2003). Intelligent support for discovery

learning.

Wagner, W., Gllner, R., Helmke, A., Trautwein, U., &

Ldtke, O. (2013). Construct validity of student

perceptions of instructional quality is high, but

not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability

of domain-independent assessments. Learning

and Instruction, 28, 1–11.

Walsh, E. M., & Tsurusaki, B. K. (2014). Science

Classroom, 4(April), 259–263.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.