Understanding the Resilience of Female Students Working in Occupational Health and Safety: A Qualitative Study

Grhasta Dian Perestroika, Niken Bayu Argaheni

Abstract


Background: Balancing dual roles as a professional and a student is a significant challenge, especially for women in the Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) field. Resilience is crucial for managing these responsibilities while ensuring workplace safety.

Objective: This study examines the lived experiences of women pursuing postgraduate education while working full-time in OHS, focusing on factors contributing to resilience.

Method: A qualitative phenomenological approach was used to explore participants' experiences. Two postgraduate students from Universitas Gadjah Mada, aged 18–45 years and actively employed in OHS, were recruited through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, addressing challenges, coping strategies, and institutional support. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, with validation techniques including member checking and triangulation.

Results: Four themes emerged: social support, adaptive coping strategies, self-efficacy, and institutional flexibility. Emotional support from family, practical assistance from colleagues, effective time management, self-reflection, and accommodating workplace policies were key enablers of resilience. These factors collectively supported participants in balancing dual roles while maintaining workplace safety.

Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of targeted support systems to enhance resilience among working students in demanding fields like OHS. Insights from this research provide a framework for institutions and policymakers to address challenges and promote safer, healthier workplaces.

Keywords


resilience, occupational health and safety, dual roles, qualitative study, workplace safety

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Burgess J, Wenborn J, Di Bona L, et al. Taking part in the community occupational therapy in dementia UK intervention from the perspective of people with dementia, family carers and occupational therapists: A qualitative study. Dementia 2021;20(6):2057–2076. 2. Wilson A, McKeaveney C, Carswell C, et al. Examining the acceptability and feasibility of the Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) programme in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: the COSMIC study protocol. Healthcare, 10. MDPI; 2022. p. 1387. 3. Faraco MM, Gelbcke FL, Brehmer LC de F, et al. Moral distress and moral resilience of nurse managers. Nurs Ethics 2022;29(5):1253–1265. 4. Yu F, Raphael D, Mackay L, et al. Personal and work-related factors associated with nurse resilience: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2019;93:129–140. 5. Zhai X, Ren L na, Liu Y, et al. Resilience training for nurses: A meta-analysis. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2021;23(6):544–550. 6. Lim J, Bogossian F, Ahern K. Stress and coping in Australian nurses: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev 2010;57(1):22–31. 7. Bai C, Bai B, Kong F. Strength use and nurses’ depressive symptoms: The mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. J Nurs Manag 2021;29(6):1660–1667. 8. Abedini Z, Khoramirad A, Ahmari Tehran H, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the perceived nursing student’s Incivility questionnaire. Nurs Open 2022;9(3):1709–1714. 9. Nurmeksela A, Pihlainen V, Kettunen T, et al. Nurse‐led counseling for coronary artery disease patients: A 1‐year follow‐up study. Nurs Health Sci 2021;23(3):678–687. 10. Tawfik DS, Sexton JB, Adair KC, et al. Context in quality of care: improving teamwork and resilience. Clin Perinatol 2017;44(3):541. 11. Larsen HG, Adu P. The theoretical framework in phenomenological research: Development and application. Routledge; 2021. 12. Broche-Pérez Y, Jiménez-Morales RM, Monasterio-Ramos LO, et al. Validity and reliability of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) in a sample of Spanish-speaking patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022;63:103914. 13. Finlay L. Thematic analysis:: the ‘good’, the ‘bad’and the ‘ugly.’ Eur J Qual Res Psychother 2021;11:103–116. 14. Motulsky SL. Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research? Qual Psychol 2021;8(3):389. 15. Coleman P. Validity and reliability within qualitative research for the caring sciences. Int J Caring Sci 2022;14(3):2041–2045. 16. Li W. Resilience among language learners: the roles of support, self-efficacy, and buoyancy. Front Psychol 2022;13:854522. 17. Islam AKMN, Mäntymäki M, Laato S, et al. Adverse consequences of emotional support seeking through social network sites in coping with stress from a global pandemic. Int J Inf Manage 2022;62:102431. 18. Tetri B, Juujärvi S. Self-efficacy, internet self-efficacy, and proxy efficacy as predictors of the use of digital social and health care services among mental health service users in Finland: A cross-sectional study. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2022:291–303. 19. Schwarzer R, Reuter T. Manage stress at work through preventive and proactive coping. Princ Organ Behav Handb Evidence‐Based Manag 3rd Ed 2023:463–482. 20. de Diego-Cordero R, Suárez-Reina P, Badanta B, et al. The efficacy of religious and spiritual interventions in nursing care to promote mental, physical and spiritual health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Nurs Res 2022;67:151618. 21. Chou CC, Iamtrakul P, Yoh K, et al. Determining the role of self-efficacy in sustained behavior change: An empirical study on intention to use community-based electric ride-sharing. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2024;179:103921. 22. Cho E, Chen TY, Cheng GHL, et al. Work–family balance self-efficacy and work–family balance during the pandemic: A longitudinal study of working informal caregivers of older adults. J Occup Health Psychol 2022;27(3):349. 23. St Clair-Thompson H, London J. Does mental toughness predict happiness over and above resilience, self-efficacy and grit? New Ideas Psychol 2024;74:101093. 24. Bozkurt A. Resilience, adaptability, and sustainability of higher education: A systematic mapping study on the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the transition to the new normal 2022. 25. Bernuzzi C, Sommovigo V, Setti I. The role of resilience in the work-life interface: A systematic review. Work 2022;73(4):1147–1165. 26. Organization WH. Peer support mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. World Health Organization; 2021.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/placentum.v13i1.98071

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Placentum: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan dan Aplikasinya

View My Stats

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0).