ANALISIS PERSEPSI SISWA LAKI-LAKI DAN PEREMPUAN KELAS X TERHADAP BIDANG STEM SETELAH MENGIKUTI PEMBELAJARAN STEM BERBASIS ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS (EDP) DI SEKOLAH MASA DEPAN YOGYAKARTA

Putri Kurniasari, Indah Widiastuti, Valiant Lukad Perdana Sutrisno

Abstract

This study aims to 1) Knowing the perceptions of prospective students of class X schools in STEM through EDP 2) Knowing gender differences in perceptions of prospective students of class X in the field of STEM through EDP. The research design used in this research is experimental research. Data collection refers to the integrated STEM learning module “Mousetrap Car” which is divided into 3 sessions, namely let's build car, mousetrap car, and mousetrap car race. The data and data sources used in this study are qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data was obtained from observation and documentation, while quantitative data was obtained from interviews and questionnaires. The sampling technique used is a saturated sampling technique, where all members are sampled. The participants in this study were 28 students of class X sains SMA Masa Depan Yogyakarta. The results of this study can be opened 1) Students' perceptions of EDP-based STEM learning are positive, students show good attitudes and characteristics in learning, students' interests and motivations are positive, but do not really affect students' self-efficacy to choose and study STEM 2). Gender differences in the perceptions of the tenth graders of Future High School in this study did not show a significant difference. Male and female students of class X sains SMA Masa Depan Yogyakarta.

Keywords

Gender,Peception,STEM,EDP,

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akcaoglu, M., Rosenberg, J. M., Ranellucci, J., & Schwarz, C. V. (2018). Outcomes from a self-generated utility value intervention on fifth and sixth-grade students’ value and interest in science. International Journal of Educational Research, 87(November 2020), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.12.001 Aktamıs, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students ’ STEM career interests , motivation , science process skills , science achievement and views. 43(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000 Aschbacher, P. R., Ing, M., & Tsai, S. M. (2013). Boosting Student Interest in Science. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(2), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500211 Berry, B., & Moore, R. (2010). The teachers of 2030. Educational Leadership, 67(8), 36–39. Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3 Brown, P. L., Concannon, P., Marx, D., Donaldson, W., & Black, A. (2016). An Examination of Middle School Students´. Journal of STEM Education, 17(3), 27–39. Carpenter, R. E., Silberman, D., & Takemoto, J. K. (2022). The Student Engagement Effect of Team-Based Learning on Student Pharmacists. 86(5). Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0065-4 Christensen, K. S., Hjorth, M., Iversen, O. S., & Smith, R. C. (2019). Understanding design literacy in middle-school education: assessing students’ stances towards inquiry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9459-y Green, A., & de Bodisco, C. (2020). Using team-based learning in discussion and writing classes. International Review of Economics Education, 35, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREE.2020.100195 Guide, M. (n.d.). In this 3 part guide. 1–5. Halim, L., Rahman, N. A., Wahab, N., & Mohtar, L. E. (2018). Factors influencing interest in STEM careers: An exploratory factor analysis. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(2). Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Closing Achievement Gaps with a Utility-Value Intervention: Disentangling Race and Social Class HHS Public Access. J Pers Soc Psychol, 111(5), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075 Hasibuan, Muda, E. (2013). 提案3 日本語教育の必要性 : 国語教育に忘れられがちな言語教育(「国語の特質」をどう考えるか-国語教育研究と日本語学研究との連携-,秋期学会 第123回 富山大会). Kokugokakyouiku, 73, 12–14. Hayden, K., Youwen Ouyang, Scinski, L., Olszewski, B., & Bielefeldt, T. (2011). Increasing Student Interest and Attitudes in STEM: Professional Development and Activities to Engage and Inspire Learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Science Teacher Education, 11(1), 47–69. Hidi, S., & Ann Renninger, K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 Householder, D. L., & Hailey, C. E. (2012). Incorporating Engineering Design Challenges into STEM Courses. Digital Commons @ USU, 0426421, 1–68. Kijima, R., Yang-yoshihara, M., & Maekawa, M. S. (2021). Using-design-thinking-to-cultivate-the-next-generation-of-female-STEAM-thinkersInternational-Journal-of-STEM-Education.pdf. International Journal of STEM Education, 6. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-021-00271-6 Liebendörfer, M., & Schukajlow, S. (2020). Quality matters: how reflecting on the utility value of mathematics affects future teachers’ interest. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09982-z Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2019). Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school students’ attitudes toward technology and technological inquiry ability. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1561432, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1561432 Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9 Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019). The Gender Gap in STEM Fields: The Impact of the Gender Stereotype of Math and Science on Secondary Students’ Career Aspirations. Frontiers in Education, 4(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060 Mori, Y., & Pell, M. D. (2019). The Look of (Un)confidence: Visual Markers for Inferring Speaker Confidence in Speech. Frontiers in Communication, 4(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00063 National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Assessment of 21st Century Skills., & National Research Council (U.S.). Center for Education. Board on Testing and Assessment. (2011). COPING SKILLS - Assessing 21st century skills. Newmann, F. W., King, M. B., & Carmichael, D. L. (n.d.). " VUIFOUJD * OTUSVDUJPO AND " TTFTTNFOU Instruction and. Nguyen, T. T., Hoang, D. L., Nguyen, H. T. L., & Nguyen, T. B. (2021). STEM-Oriented activities for improving student performance in Chu Van An secondary school, Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012053 Norgbey, E. B. (2016). Gender Disparity in Stem Higher Education Programs : Design Studies. Nurtanto, M., Pardjono, P., Widarto, W., & Ramdani, S. D. (2020). The effect of STEM-EDP in professional learning on automotive engineering competence in vocational high school. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.645047 O’Connell, K. B., Keys, B., & Storksdieck, M. (2017). Taking Stock of Oregon STEM Hubs: Accomplishments and Challenges. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/hq37vt23t Patel, D. S. (2014). Body language: An effective communication tool. IUP Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 90–95. Remington, T. L., Bleske, B. E., Bartholomew, T., Dorsch, M. P., Guthrie, S. K., Klein, K. C., Tingen, J. M., & Wells, T. D. (2017). Qualitative analysis of student perceptions comparing team-based learning and traditional lecture in a pharmacotherapeutics course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(3). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe81355 Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., Craig Schroeder, D., Delaney, A., Putnam, L., & Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4 Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The effectiveness of stem-based on gender differences: The impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753 Schon, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580516 Simarro, C., & Couso, D. (2021). Engineering practices as a framework for STEM education: a proposal based on epistemic nuances. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00310-2 Strimel, G., & Grubbs, M. E. (2016). Positioning technology and engineering education as a key force in STEM education. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.21061/JTE.V27I2.A.2 Sutaphan, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2019). STEM Education Teaching approach: Inquiry from the Context Based. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012003 Teo, T., Unwin, S., Scherer, R., & Gardiner, V. (2021). Computers & Education Initial teacher training for twenty-first century skills in the Fourth Industrial Revolution ( IR 4 . 0 ): A scoping review. Computers & Education, 170(May), 104223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104223 Thi Hoa, T. (2018). Common Issues in High School Student’s Career Decision – Making Choice and Supporting Measurement in Career Consulting. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(5), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-5-1 van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2019). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100(October 2018), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017 Vossen, T. E., Tigelaar, E. H., Henze, I., De Vries, M. J., & Van Driel, J. H. (2020). Student and teacher perceptions of the functions of research in the context of a design-oriented STEM module. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09523-7 Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1 Wall, R. (2003). Ready, Set ... Aviation Week and Space Technology (New York), 159(15), 21–23. Widya, Rifandi, R., & Laila Rahmi, Y. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208 Xu, C., Lem, S., & Onghena, P. (2021). Examining developmental relationships between utility value, interest, and cognitive competence for college statistics students with differential self-perceived mathematics ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 86(September 2020), 101980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101980 Zeki, C. P. (2009). The importance of non-verbal communication in classroom management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1443–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.254

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/nozel.v4i3.72253

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.