PELAKSANAAN PRAKTIK KERJA INDUSTRI PADA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XI DI SMK NEGERI 2 KARANGANYAR DENGAN MODEL KIRKPATRICK

Ayu Nuvita Sari, Muhammad Akhyar, Nyenyep Sriwardani

Abstract

This study aims at: (1) obtaining a description the quality of implementation Internship Program Competency Ototronic Engineering class XI in SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar in terms of the Reaction component; (2 obtaining a description the quality of implementation Internship Program Competency Ototronic Engineering class XI in SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar in terms of the Learning component; (3) obtaining a description the quality of implementation Internship Program Competency Ototronic Engineering class XI in SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar in terms of the Behavior component.This research was conducted at SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar. This study was included in the type of evaluative research (evaluation research) where the evaluation model used was Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. The population in the study were students of SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar at the Ototronic Engineering Expertise Program and the supervisor of the school in the ototronic engineering expertise program and supervisors in the industry who directly assisted the implementation of industrial work practices. The number of respondents was 108 students, 5 mentors for the ototronic engineering expertise program, and 5 mentors in the industry. Data collection techniques in this study used a questionnaire method that was distributed to students, an interview method with some student respondents, and all school supervisors and industry teachers, and documentation of the final score of Internship. Validity uses fact finding, namely the validity of logic. Therefore, fact finding for reliability testing is not necessary. Score analysis uses average analysis which will be assessed based on research criteria. The results of the study show: (1) aspects of reaction with student respondents who have an average value of 3.88 which includes very high criteria, this is indicated by the results on the indicators giving direction of 3.99; (2) aspects of evaluating learning with student respondents who have an average value of 3.82 which includes very high criteria, this is intended with the results on the discipline indicator of 4.00; (3) aspects of behavior evaluation with student respondents who have an average value of 4.07 which includes very high criteria, this is indicated by the results on the skills indicator after the internship is 4.25; (4) from the results of research conducted to obtaining a comprehensive picture when viewed from the components of reaction, learning, and behavior is very high including very high criteria.

Keywords

Industrial work practices, Kirkpatrick, students of SMK Negeri 2 Karanganyar in the Ototronic Engineering Expertise Program

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anidi. (2017). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safruddin AJ. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan.Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1990). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arsana, Made, Marhaeni, A.A.I.N., Suastra, I, Wayan. (2013). Implementasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbantuan Media Lingkungan Sekitar untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar IPA. e- Journal Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. 3 (1).

Badan Pusat Statistika, https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2018/11/30/c09766cb5f15e934d24893 a7/statistik-pendapatan-agustus-2018.html diakses pada 12 Febuari 2019.

Dikmenjur. (2004). Kurikulum SMK. Jakarta: Dikmenjur

Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. (2008). Pelaksanaan Prakerim. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikdasmen Depdiknas.

Hasan, H. (2008). Evaluasi Kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Kempmendikbud RI No. 0490/U/1992 tentang Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Pasal 2 Ayat 1.

Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan dan kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Nomor 323/U/1997. (1998) Tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Sistem Ganda Pada sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. 1998. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 235 Montgomery Street: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, Inc

Kirkpatrick, D.L., Kirkpatrick, J.D., (2006). Evaluating Training Program; The Four Levels, 3rd Edition. 235 Montgomery Street: Berrett Koehler, Inc.

Nolker H. dan Schoenfeldt E. (1983). Pendidikan Kejuruan. Jakart: Gramedia.

Pakpahan J. (1994). Pembinaan dan Pengembangan PEndidikan Sistem Ganda pada Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jakarta:Ditdikmenjur.

Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional nomor 19 tahun 2007. (2007). Tentang standar pengelolaan pendidikan.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 29 Tahun 1990 . (1990). Tentang Pendidikan Menengah Kejuruan. Jakarta. Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Nomor 19 tahun 2005.

Prasetyo, Beni. (2013). Evaluasi Program Praktik Kerja Industri Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Bangunan SMK N 2 Klaten. Skripsi PTSP UNY.

Ridhotullah, S. (2015). Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakarya.

Rriduwan. (2012). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan, Peneliti, Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Seri Pendidikan Nasional . (1999). Pendidikan Sistem Ganda. Jakarta.

Sudjatmiko dan Lili Nurlaili. (2003). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta:Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Sugiyono. (2012). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukardi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Sukardi. (2012). Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sukardi. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Trianto. (2012). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada media Grup.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Wardiman Djojonegoro. (1998). Pengembangan Sumberdaya Manusia Melalui Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK). Jakarta: Balitbang Depdikbud.

Widoyoko, S.E.P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Paduan Praktis bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta Pustaka Pelajar.

Wirawara. (2011). Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi, dan Profesi. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Yusuf, Ferinda. (2000). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.