Analisis Kelayakan Tekno-Ekonomi Menggunakan Metode Net Present Value (NPV) dan Internal Rate Of Return (IRR) pada Konversi Mesin Diesel 1-Silinder ke Biodiesel B20 Berbasis Limbah Minyak Jelantah pada Industri Tahu Skala UMKM
Abstract
The reliance of the MSME-scale tofu industry on diesel fuel for single-cylinder diesel engines results in high operating costs and increased exhaust emissions. B20 biodiesel made from used cooking oil is a fuel alternative with the potential to reduce production costs, minimize waste, and support the adoption of renewable energy. This study aims to analyze the techno-economic feasibility of using B20 biodiesel derived from used cooking oil in single-cylinder diesel engines through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, adhering to the PRISMA principles. The reviewed literature consists of scientific publications from 2019 to 2025 that discuss the performance of diesel engines fueled by B20 biodiesel, the utilization of used cooking oil as a biodiesel feedstock, and technical-economic analyses using Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The results of the study indicate that the use of B20 biodiesel leads to a 1–3% decrease in effective power, a 2–5% decrease in thermal efficiency, and a 5–10% increase in specific fuel consumption. Nevertheless, these changes remain within the operational tolerance limits of SMEs and do not require significant engine modifications. From an environmental perspective, B20 biodiesel reduces CO, HC, and particulate emissions, although there is a tendency for NOx emissions to increase. From an economic perspective, a positive NPV and an IRR of 12–25%, which exceeds the MARR of 9.5%, indicate that converting diesel engines to B20 biodiesel is financially viable. Thus, the use of B20 biodiesel made from used cooking oil can serve as an economical, practical, and sustainable alternative energy solution for the MSME-scale tofu industry.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aklouche, Fatma Zohra, Loubna Hadhoum, and Khaled Loubar. 2023. “A Comprehensive Study on Effect of Biofuel Blending Obtained from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Olive Mill Waste.” 16(6):1–16. Analysis, Gap. 2022. “Construction 4.0 Technologies and Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis.” 12(12):1–19. Athanasiou, Costas, Christos Drosakis, Gaylord Kabongo Booto, and Costas Elmasides. 2023. “Economic Feasibility of Power / Heat Cogeneration by Biogas – Solid Oxide Fuel Cell ( SOFC ) Integrated Systems.” 16(1):1–30. Cardoso, Geraldo, De Oliveira Neto, and Francesco Facchini. 2022. “Circular Economy Approach on Energy Cogeneration in Petroleum Refining.” 15(5):1–15. Decarpigny, C., Abdulhadi Aljawish, C. His, Bertrand Fertin, Muriel Bigan, Pascal Dhulster, Michel Millares, and R. Froidevaux. 2022. “Bioprocesses for the Biodiesel Production from Waste Oils and Valorization of Glycerol.” 15(9):1–30. Impacts, Environmental. 2022. “Biodiesel Emissions: A State-of-the-Art Review on Health and Environmental Impacts.” 15(18):1–24. Kamil, Mohammed, and Fatima M. Almarashda. 2023. “Economic Viability and Engine Performance Evaluation of Biodiesel Derived from Desert Palm Date Seeds.” 16(3):1–22. Karczewski, Mirosław, and Grzegorz Szamrej. 2022. “Experimental Assessment of the Impact of Replacing Diesel Fuel with CNG on the Concentration of Harmful Substances In.” 15(13):1–26. Magelli, Matteo, Giuseppe Boccardo, Nicola Bosso, Pierangelo Farina, Andrea Tosetto, Francesco Mocera, and Aurelio Soma. 2021. “Feasibility Study of a Diesel-Powered Hybrid DMU.” 29:1–14. Manikandan, Gurunathan, P. Rajesh Kanna, Dawid Taler, and Tomasz Sobota. 2023. “Review of Waste Cooking Oil ( WCO ) as a Feedstock for Biofuel — Indian Perspective.” 16(4):1–17. Model, Projects A. Multi-objective Optimization, Lei Gao, Zhen-yu Zhao, and Cui Li. 2022. “An Investment Decision-Making Approach for Power Grid.” 15(3):1–20. Reksowardojo, Iman K., Hari Setiapraja, Siti Yubaidah, Dieni Mansur, and Agnes K. Putri. 2023. “A Study on Utilization of High-Ratio Biodiesel and Pure Biodiesel in Advanced Vehicle Technologies.” 16(2):1–14. Sawdust, Wood. 2023. “Technoeconomic Feasibility of Bioenergy Production from Wood Sawdust.” 16(4):1–18. Xu, Hui, Longwen Ou, Yuan Li, Troy R. Hawkins, and Michael Wang. 2022. “Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel Production in the United States.” 56(12):1–10. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00289. Zarrinkolah, Mohammad Taghi, and Vahid Hosseini. 2022. “Detailed Analysis of the Effects of Biodiesel Fraction Increase Reactivity-Controlled Compression Ignition.” 15(3):1–17.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.







