PERBANDINGAN BIAYA DAN WAKTU KOMPONEN DINDING MENGGUNAKAN SISTEM KONVENSIONAL DAN SISTEM MODULAR GEDUNG FPSD UPI
Abstract
Over time, Indonesia's development is advancing. Conventional techniques are now thought to be less efficient in terms of time and expense. Because of this, we require a construction innovation which specifically the development of a modular system in order to decrease the cost and duration of construction activity. The factory-fabricated materials used in the modular technique are installed using a tower crane. For the conventional approach and the modular method which uses precast concrete for wall component work, the comparison research uses lightweight brick material. This research used cost and time variables as a comparison of wall work with conventional methods and modular methods. This study used the FPSD Building project of the Indonesian University of Education (UPI) for data collection which was then processed with Microsoft Excel software. This study aimed to analyze cost and time efficiency to determine the percentage of savings in the use of precast concrete as an alternative in the future. The results of this study for light brick wall work require a fee of IDR 5,648,755,562.71 and walls using precast concrete materials at a price of IDR 6,916,150,235.52. Meanwhile, in terms of time, the fastest wall work duration was wall work using precast concrete material, which was 138 days. Whereas the longest time for wall work was using lightweight brick material with a duration of 231 days.
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ahmadian, FFA, A. Akbarnezhad, TH Rashidi, dan ST Waller.2016. “Menghitung waktu transportasi dalam merencanakan pengiriman material konstruksi di luar lokasi.”J. Konstr. Ind. Mengelola.142 (1): 04015050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001030.
Arashpour, M., R. Wakefield, EWM Lee, R. Chan, dan MR Hosseini. 2016. "Analisis ketidakpastian interaksi dalam aktivitas di tempat dan diluar lokasi: Implikasi untuk konstruksi hibrida."Int. J. Manajemen Proyek.34 (7): 1393-1402.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.004. Arbulu,
Armstrong, Richard., 1972, Better Ways to Building Process Plant, Chemical Engineering, Vol.79, No.79, pp.87-94.
Boyd, N., MMA Khalfan, dan T. Maqsood. 2013. “Konstruksi di luar lokasi gedung apartemen.”J.Arsitek. Ind.19 (1): 51–57.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-556800009.
Ervianto, W. I. 2008. Potensi Penggunaan Sistem Modular Pada Proyek Konstruksi. Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta, 8(2), 170–183.
Ferdous, W., Y. Bai, TD Ngo, A. Manalo, dan P. Mendis. 2019. “Barukemajuan, tantangan, dan peluang bangunan modular bertingkat–Sebuah tinjauan mutakhir.”Ind. Struktur.183 (Mar): 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.061.
Generalova, E. M., Generalov, V. P., & Kuznetsova A. A. 2016. Modular Buildings in Modern Construction. Procedia engineering, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.098.
Hesler, Nilson. 1990. Modular Design-Where It Fits, Chemical Engineering Process, October, pp. 120-124.
Katayama dan Bennett. 1996. “Produksi ramping dalam lingkungan yang berubah dunia yang petitif: Perspektif Jepang.”Int. J.Oper. Melecut. Mengelola. 16 (2): 8–23.https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579610109811.
McCluskey, Alan. (2000). “Modularity: upgrading to the next generation design architecture”. Business and Media official.
Nikmehr, B., M. Reza Hosseini, R. Rameezdeen, N. Chileshe, P.Ghoddousi, dan M. Arashpour. 2017. “Model terintegrasi untuk faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi pengelolaan limbah konstruksi dan pembongkaran di Iran.”Ind. Batasan Arsitek. Mengelola.24 (6): 1246–1268.https://doi.org/10.1108 /ECAM-01-2016-0015.
Pradana, E. C. & Rosyad, F. 2021. Perbandingan Pelaksanaan Dinding Precast dengan Dinding konvensional Ditinjau dari Segi Waktu, Biaya, dan Kualitas : 896-903
Pulungan, S. 2018. Analisis Perbandingan Metode Dinding Precast dengan Metode Dinding Konvensional Ditinjau dari Segi Biaya dan Waktu pada Proyek Podomoro City Deli Medan. Tugas Akhir, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, 2018 Diakses dari http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/8619
Tatum, C. B. 1987. Improving Constructibility During Conceptual Planning, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. vol.113, No.2 June, pp.191-207.
Vrijhoef, R., dan L. Koskela. 2005. “Meninjau kembali tiga kekhasanproduksi dalam konstruksi.” DiProk., Int. Grup untuk Konstruksi Lean 13th Annual Conf. (IGLC-13),19–27. Sydney, Australia: Grup Internasional untuk Konstruksi Lean.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.