PERBANDINGAN BIAYA DAN WAKTU PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG PASCASARJANA UPI DENGAN METODE MODULAR PADA DINDING

Ary Setyawan, Gabriella Angelisa Claudia, Fajar Sri Handayani

Abstract

The Indonesian University of Education faced project delays that had an impact on the budget and timing of the Postgraduate Building's development. The UPI Postgraduate Building is being constructed using traditional methods, which results in a lengthy amount of work. The aforesaid issue might have a solution in the modular approach. The modular approach can swiftly meet significant customer demands since it has a production technique for creating components that are mass-produced. The conventional method's implementation costs and timeline are being contrasted with the modular method's implementation costs and timeline. The cost and construction time of traditional walls and modular walls which use precast concrete materials and lightweight concrete panels are compared for wall components. To make the optimal decision, the analysis was done using the comparison technique and the cost-effectiveness analysis approach. From the results of the analysis, the use of precast concrete and lightweight concrete panels experienced cost inefficiencies of 17.92% and 11.75% but were able to save time 62.03% and 34.78% respectively. Based on the Cost Effectiveness Analysis, an alternative material that was a more cost-effective choice was precast concrete walls.

References

Ervianto, W. I. 2008. Potensi Penggunaan Sistem Modular pada Proyek Konstruksi. Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta, 8(2), 170-183.

Hesler, Nilson. 1990. Modular Design-Where It Fits, Chemical Engineering Process, October, pp. 120-124.

Hanifah, Nur et al. 2021. Perbandingan Dinding Precast dan Bata Ringan Terhadap Biaya dan Waktu pada Façade Proyek Suncity Apartement Sidoarjo. 7(1):40-51

Hidayat, F. & Irvan, G. 2018. Analisa Perbandingan Biaya, Waktu, Material, dan Tata Laksana Pekerjaan Dinding Menggunakan Bata Ringan, Sandwich Panel dan Beton Precast pada Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Sakit "STC" di Kota Jakarta. Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Katolik Parahyangan: Bandung, 7(2), 46-50.

Najoan, C.H., Tjakra, J., & Pratasis, P.A.K. 2016. Analisis Metode Pelaksanaan Plat Prceast dengan Plat Konvensional ditinjau dari Waktu dan Biaya (Studi Kasus : Markas Komando Daerah Militer Manado). Jurnal Teknik Sipil Startik. Vol 4 No 5 Mei 2016.

Nurdiana, A. 2015. Analisis Biaya Tidak Langsung pada Proyek pembangunan Best Western Star Hotel & Star Apartement Semarang. Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Sahid, Muh Nur & Imam Safi’I. 2012. Analisa Perbandingan Produktivitas Kerja pada Pekerjaan Dinding Bata Konvensional dengan Dinding Blok Hebel. Simposium Nasional RAPI XI FT UMS, TS-36.

Sari, Novita Sely. 2019. Evaluasi Anggaran Biaya Menggunakan Batu Merah dan Batu Bata Ringan Gedung Kantor Kelurahan Bareng Kecamatan Klaten Tengah Kabupaten Klaten, Jurnal Qua Teknik, 9(1):2-4

Sri Velamati. 2012. Feasibility, Benefits and Challenges of Modular Construction in High Rise Development in The United States : A Developer’s Perspective. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Pages: 8-9.

Tatum, C. B. 1987. Improving Constructibility During Conceptual Planning, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. vol.113, No.2 June, pp.191-207

Telaumbanua, Tommy A., Jantje B. M. dan Mochtar Sibi. 2017. Perencanaan Waktu Penyelesaian Proyek Toko Modisland Manado dengan Metode CPM, Jurnal Sipil Statik, 5(8):10.

Prihatanti, Nilla A & Muhammad Faqih. 2016. Rumah Vertikal Ekologis di Surakarta dengan Fasilitas Pemberdayaan Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah.

Putra, S.P & Pontan, D. 2020. Analisis Perbandingan Biaya danWaktu Pelaksanaan antara Dinding Cast in Situ dan Dinding Precast (Studi Kasus Citra Plaza Nagoya, Batam).

Winter, Nilson. 1979. Design of Concrete Structure, Tokyo.

Wohon. Fransisko Yeremia. 2015. Analisa Pengaruh Percepatan Durasi pada Biaya Proyek Menggunakan Program Microsoft Project 2014 (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Gereja GMIM Syaloom Karombasan). Jurnal Teknik Sipil 3 (2) (2337-6732): 141-50.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.