Financial Performance and Sustainability Orientation: A Comparative Analysis of Family-Controlled (ICBP) vs. Multinational Firms (UNVR) in Indonesia
Abstract
Emerging markets are characterized by a unique dualism where large local conglomerates compete directly with global subsidiaries amidst economic volatility and increasing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) demands. This study aims to investigate how distinct ownership structures influence corporate strategy by comparing a major family-controlled enterprise and a multinational subsidiary in the Indonesian consumer goods sector. Utilizing a descriptive comparative approach, we analyze the profitability, solvency, and automated text-mining results of sustainability disclosures from PT Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur Tbk. and PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk. for the fiscal year 2024. Grounded in Socioemotional Wealth and Agency Theory, the findings reveal a fundamental strategic divergence. The family-controlled firm demonstrates a highly conservative capital structure and prioritizes social legacy to ensure dynastic continuity and community integration. Conversely, the multinational entity maximizes equity returns through aggressive leverage and heavily emphasizes environmental standardization to maintain global legitimacy. Ultimately, the strategic differences between these entities reflect a deliberate trade-off between socioemotional preservation and principal-agent capital maximization, offering vital risk-assessment insights for investors and policymakers in developing economies.
Keywords: agency theory; capital structure; corporate governance; ESG disclosure; socioemotional wealthFull Text:
PDFReferences
Abdelhalim, K., & Eldin, A. G. (2019). Can CSR help achieve sustainable development? Applying a new assessment model to CSR cases from Egypt. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 39(9–10), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2019-0120
Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25 (3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Doluca, H., Wagner, M., & Block, J. (2018). Sustainability and environmental behaviour in family firms: a longitudinal analysis of environment-related activities, innovation and performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1998
el Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wang, H., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2016). Family control and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking and Finance, 73, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.08.008
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Joni, J., Ahmed, K., & Hamilton, J. (2020). Politically connected boards, family business groups and firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 16(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-09-2019-0091
Khan, R. U., Javed, U., & Ahmad, M. A. (2025). The nexus between socioemotional wealth, entrepreneurial bricolage, and family-owned SME’s international performance, firm type as moderator, analysis through multi-group. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100668
Mariska, R., & Dharma, B. (2024). Influence of capital, business duration, education level, and gender on business income. Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Bisnis, 29(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkb.v29i1.88264
Mochklas, M., & Soelistya, D. (2024). Analysis of Business Success of Female MSMEs in Surabaya Culinary Tourism Center. Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Bisnis, 29(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkb.v28i2.93643
Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., Chtioui, T., & Rebolledo, C. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market value: Family versus nonfamily firms. Journal of Business Research, 77, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.001
Saidat, Z., Silva, M., & Seaman, C. (2019). The relationship between corporate governance and financial performance: Evidence from Jordanian family and nonfamily firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 9(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-11-2017-0036
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
Tanjung, M. (2020). A cross-firm analysis of corporate governance compliance and performance in Indonesia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(5), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2019-2328
Waldau, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on determinants and outcomes of ESG performance in family firms. Management Review Quarterly, 75(4), 3357–3415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00462-9
Zarefar, A., Agustia, D., & Soewarno, N. (2022). Bridging the Gap between Sustainability Disclosure and Firm Performance in Indonesian Firms: The Moderating Effect of the Family Firm. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912022Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.











