PEMAKNAAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP SIMBOL PANCASILA SEBAGAI IDENTITAS BANGSA
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to: To find out the meaning of the Pancasila symbol in the souls of students, To find out the practice of Pancasila values on student life, To know students in responding to Pancasila towards the meaning of a nation's identity.This study uses qualitative methods through in-depth interview techniques, and direct observation. Primary data obtained from interviews. The sampling of this study was through purposive sampling.
The results of this study are: The meaning of students towards Pancasila based on Max Weber's theory of action can be categorized into rational values (werk rational) which are based on divine values, mutual respect, adab, and humanity, and the value of justice. Besides affective actions based on the love of water and unity, The application of Pancasila into the daily lives of students can be categorized into rational acts of values based on mutual respect and do not differentiate between religious adherents, values unity and value of deliberation to reach consensus; affective actions based on the love of the motherland; instrumental rational actions based on means of respect and tolerance to achieve peace and unity, and means of association, participation in activities in society, Student attitudes towards Pancasila as a nation's identification are categorized into rational acts of value based on values respect for differences, values of togetherness or unity; instrumental rational value actions (zwerk rational) which are based on means of deliberation to reach consensus, the struggle to achieve goals; Affective action that is based on the love of the motherland.Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alex, Sobur. 2015. Analisis Teks Media : Suatu Pengantar Analisis Wacana, Analisis Semiotika, dan Analisis Framing. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
Alwi, Mahmud. 2016. “Aktualisasi Nilai-nilai Sila Pancasila dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum PAI di SMP Negeri 9 Yogyakarta.” Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Pendidikan Agama Islam Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2016.
Astuti, Desta Ariyani. 2010. “Pemaknaan Dosen Terhadap Gaya Pakaian Kuliah Mahasiswa FISIP UNS”. Skripsi. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Banner, P. 1985. Quality of Life: A Phenomenological Perspective on Explanation, Prediction, and Understanding in Nursing Science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8 (1) pp 1-14.
Cambell, Tom.1994. Tujuh Teori Sosial Sketsa Penilaian dan Perbandingan. Yogyakarta: Kansisus.
Craib, Lain. 1992. Teori-Teori Sosial Modern: Dari Pasons sampai Habermas Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Eriyanto. 2002. Analisis Framing (Konstruksi ,Ideologi, Politik Media).Yogyakarta: Lkis.
Handerson, A.M. dan Parsons, Talcot (ed). 1964. Max Weber: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press.
Hariyono. 2014. Ideologi Pancasila Roh Progresif Nasionalisme Indonesia. Malang: Intans Publishing.
Hutahuruk. M, SH. 1984. Gelora Nasionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta : Elangga.
Kaelan, 2000. Pendidikan Pancasila. Yogyakarta : Paradigma.
Kinseng, Rilus A. 2017. Struktugensi: Sebuah Teori Tindakan Structugency: A Theory of Action. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan Agustus 2017, hal 127-137
Martoredjo, Nikodemus Thomas. 2016. Building Character Through Pancasila Values To Sovereign Nation. HUMANIORA Vol. 7 No.1 January 2016: 116-121
Mohamad Na’im. 2012. The Role Of The Appreciation Of History Education: The Internalization Of Pancasila Ideology And Religious Values On Creating The Nationalism Attitude. HISTORIA: International Journal of History Education, Vol. XIII, No. 2 (December 2012).
Oesman Oetodjo dan Alfian. 1992. Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Dalam Berbagai Bidang Kehidupan Bermasyarakat, Berbangsa dan Bernegara. Jakarta: BP– 7.
Olson, G Keith. 1984. Counseling Teenagers, 5 thed. Colorado: Thom Schultz Publications, Inc.
Rahayu Sri Ani. 2013. Pendidikan Pancasila & Kewarganegaraan(PPKn). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Saman, Florianus Maria Joni.2016. Veerstehen Sebagai Metode Memahami Makna Tindakan Sosial Menurut Max Weber. Majalah Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Rajawali, Tahun XII, No 1, Januari 2016.
Santrock, John W. 2002. Adolescene Perkembangan Remaja. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Siregar, Eddie, Drs, M.Si. 2012. Empat Pilar Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara. Jakarta : Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI.
Supraja, Muhammad. 2012. Alfred Schutz: Rekonstruksi Teori Tindakan Max Weber Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Volume 1 No.2 , November 2012
Sutoyo. 2011. Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Untuk Perguruan Tinggi, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
Titib, I Made. 2001. Teologi & Simbol – Simbol Praktis Kehidupan. Surabaya: Paramita.
Triguna, Ida Bagus Gede Yudha. 2000. Teori Tentang Simbol. Denpasar : Widya Darma. Bandung. Alfabeta.
Weber, Max, 1968. Economy and Society. Vol 1. (Wirschaft and Gesselschaft) Los Angeles: University of California Press Berkeley.
Weber, Max. 1946. Sosiologi, (judul asli: From Max Weber: Essays in Sosiology, Oxford University Press. diterjemahkan oleh Noorkholis dan Tim Penerjemah Promothea, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society, vol. 1 (judul asli: Wirtschaft and Gesselschaft)t diterjemahkan oleh Guenter Roth dan Claus Wittich (Los Angeles: University of California Press Berkeley, 1968),
Yudistira Aktualisasi dan Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dalam Menumbuh Kembangkan Karakter Bangsa. Seminar Nasional Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016, 421-43
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jodasc.v2i2.41661
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
