KONFLIK SOSIAL ANTARA OJEK PANGKALAN DAN GOJEK DI KOTA SURAKARTA

Dwi Nurindah Rahayu, Ahmad Zuber

Abstract


In this research try to raise the theme of conflict research between traditional ojek drivers and GoJek in the city of Surakarta. GoJek is present with various services needed and influential for the community in all activities quickly and efficiently. But on the other hand Gojek is a rival for traditional ojek drivers and the exsistence of GoJek triggers conflict. The purpose of this research is to find out how conflicts occur between traditional ojek drivers and GoJek, what are the forms of conflict, factors that affect conflict and how conflict prevention efforts. The theory used is social conflict theory from Lewis L. Coser. Types of research used in this phenomenon is descriptive qualitative, with data collection techniques through observation, interviews and from secondary data and documentation. The sample uses a purposive sampling technique. With the stipulation of the informants of the traditional ojek drivers,GoJek drivers and traditional ojek and GoJek consumers. The data validity technique uses source triangulation. While the data analysis uses 3 channels namely data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions.

The results showed that the conflict that occurred between traditional ojek driver and GoJek occurred due to the reduced income of ojek, because people preferred to use GoJek. The form of conflict that occurs between conventional ojek and GoJek is divided into two, namely the form of manifest conflict (open) and latent conflict (closed). Forms of manifest conflicts include beatings, quarrels and struggles for attributes. While latent forms of conflict include jealousy and envy and disappointment. Conflict between conventional ojek and GoJek is caused by several factors including land limitations, system differences, and tariff differences. So that the conflict does not continue, several efforts have been made to overcome the conflict, namely the determination of the red zone boundary, warning or warning, and reporting to the authorities.


Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Asosiasi penyelenggara jasa internet indonesia. 2018. Survei tentang penetrasi dan perilaku pengguna internet indonesia.

Denys Lombard, Nusa Jawa; Silang Budaya Batas-Batas Pembaratan jilid 1, (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008), hlm. 134.

Dwi Ratna Nurhajarini, “Trem Di Surabaya Masa Kolonial Sampai Pasca Kolonial”, dalam Patrawidya, (Vol. 14, No. 3, 2013), hlm. 442.

Imam Subarkah, Sekilas 125 Tahun Kereta Api Kita 1867-1992, (Bandung: Yayasan Pustaka- PT Intergrafika, 1992), hlm. 9.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta : Balai Pustaka, 2016

Moleong, Lexy J. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Poloma, M. Margaret. 2000. Sosiologi Kontemporer, Jakarta : CV. Rajawali

Pruitt, Dean G dan Jeffrey Z. Rubin. 2009. Teori Konflik Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta

Qomarun,Prayitno Budi, Morfologi Kota Solo (tahun 1500-2000),Yogyakarta : Universitas Kristen Petra, 2007), Vol. 35 No 1

Ritzer, George dan Douglas J Goodman. 2008. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Kencana.

Rudolf Mrazek, Engineers of Happy Land Perkembangan Teknologi dan Nasionalisme di Sebuah Koloni, (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2006 ), hlm.8.

Silalahi, Ulber. 2009. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Soekanto, Soerjono. 1992. Memperkenalkan Sosiologi, Jakarta : CV. Rajawali Press

Soekanto, Soerjono. 2006. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta : Raja Grapindo Persada

Susan, Novri . 2010. Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik dan isu-isu Konflik Kontemporer, Jakarta : Kencana

Sutopo, HB. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif edisi Kedua. Surakarta: UNS Press

Undang-undang republik Indonesia nomer 7 tahun 2012 Tentang Penanganan Konflik Sosial pasal 1

Jurnal :

Amaya Andri Damaini, Ginanjar Setyo Nugroho dan Suyoto. 2018. Fraud Crime Mitigation of Mobile Application Users for Online Transportation.Vol 12 No 3

Ardiansyah, Angga . 2016. Interaksi Komunikasi GoJek (ojek online) dalam Menyelesaiakan Konflik dengan Opang (Ojek Pangkalan). Jakarta : Universitas Mercubuana

Darma, Fania. 2016. Kreativitas Digital Dalam Masyarakat Risiko Perkotaan: Studi Tentang Ojek Online “Go-Jek” di Jakarta. Jakarta : Universitas Indonesia

Demartoto, Argyo. 2017. “Pemahaman Akan Konflik Pada Masyarakat Industri Menurut Lewis Coser dan Ralf Dahrendof” ; 24 (1), 1-48. Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Perdana, Muhammad. 2018. Faktor Penyebab Konflik Antara Ojek Online Dan Ojek Konvensional (Studi Kasus Ojek Online Dan Konvensional Di Kota Bandar Lampung). Universitas Lampung

Siti Nadhilah, 2017. Fenomena Penggunaan Aplikasi Gojek Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Kota Bandung. Bandung. Universitas Pasundan.

Swastika, Mega . 2017 . Fungsionalitas Konflik Gojek: Studi Fenomenologi Terhadap Konflik Pengemudi Gojek di Kota Kediri. Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Yusup,2017.Konflik Sosial Antara Ojek Online Dan Ojek Konvensional (Ojek Pangkalan) Sebagai Akibat Keberadaan Gojek: Studi Deskriptif Di Kecamatan Sukasari, Bandung. Other Thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jodasc.v2i1.41656

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Recent Issues