Developing E-Commerce Regulatory Standards for Online Dispute Resolution

Muthia Sakti

Abstract


Disputes involving losses or defaults suffered Prolong the process and create uncertainty for the company or the disputing parties. Consequently, alternative dispute resolution facilitates the dispute resolution process for online transactions. One is to provide alternative dispute resolution via Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). The Method study employs the descriptive-analytic approach to acquire in-depth data that will be meaningful. This study intends to examine the opportunities and challenges faced by buyers in using Online Dispute Resolution. Concluded Although juridically, the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Law do not regulate ODR, Some forms of legal discovery that can be done are interpretation and analogy to explain the provisions of the articles in the Arbitration Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution.


Keywords


E-Commerce; Dispute; Online; Alternative;

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Abedi, Fahimeh, John Zeleznikow, and Chris Brien, ‘Developing Regulatory Standards for the Concept of Security in Online Dispute Resolution Systems’, Computer Law and Security Review, 35.5 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.05.003

Arkhipov, Vladislav, and Victor Naumov, ‘The Legal Definition of Personal Data in the Regulatory Environment of the Russian Federation: Between Formal Certainty and Technological Development’, Computer Law and Security Review, 32.6 (2016), 868–87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.07.009

Bt Mohd, Nur Azimah, and Zarul Fitri Zaaba, ‘A Review of Usability and Security Evaluation Model of E-Commerce Website’, Procedia Computer Science, 161 (2019), 1199–1205 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.233

Christiani, Theresia Anita, ‘Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219 (2016), 201–7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006

Clifford, Damian, and Yung Shin Van Der Sype, ‘Online Dispute Resolution: Settling Data Protection Disputes in a Digital World of Customers’, Computer Law and Security Review, 32.2 (2016), 272–85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.12.014

Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina, Peter Grajzl, Atanas Slavov, and Katarina Zajc, ‘Courts in a Transition Economy: Case Disposition and the Quantity-Quality Tradeoff in Bulgaria’, Economic Systems, 40.1 (2016), 18–38 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2015.09.002

Gaffar, Salahuddin, Agus Mulya Karsona, Yani Pujiwati, and Indra Perwira, ‘The Concept of Procedural Law Regarding the Implementation of Collective Agreements with Legal Certainty in Termination of Employment in Indonesia’, Heliyon, 7.4 (2021), e06690 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06690

Garín-Muñoz, Teresa, Rafael López, Teodosio Pérez-Amaral, Iñigo Herguera, and Angel Valarezo, ‘Models for Individual Adoption of ECommerce, EBanking and EGovernment in Spain’, Telecommunications Policy, 43.1 (2019), 100–111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.01.002

Guo, Meirong, ‘Internet Court’s Challenges and Future in China’, Computer Law and Security Review, 40 (2021), 105522 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105522

Knudsen, Laine Fogh, and Signe Balina, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems Across the European Union, Iceland and Norway’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109 (2014), 944–48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.569

Kong, Xiang T.R., Ray Y. Zhong, Zhiheng Zhao, Saijun Shao, Ming Li, Peng Lin, and others, ‘Cyber Physical Ecommerce Logistics System: An Implementation Case in Hong Kong’, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 139.April 2019 (2020), 106170 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106170

Lee, Chia Kuang, Tak Wing Yiu, and Sai On Cheung, ‘Selection and Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Construction Projects - Past and Future Research’, International Journal of Project Management, 34.3 (2016), 494–507 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.008

Mania, Karolina, ‘Online Dispute Resolution: The Future of Justice’, International Comparative Jurisprudence, 1.1 (2015), 76–86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.006

Matsumoto, Shigeru, ‘A Duration Analysis of Environmental Alternative Dispute Resolution in Japan’, Ecological Economics, 70.4 (2011), 659–66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.014

Mohammed, Zareef A., and Gurvirender P. Tejay, ‘Examining Privacy Concerns and Ecommerce Adoption in Developing Countries: The Impact of Culture in Shaping Individuals’ Perceptions toward Technology’, Computers and Security, 67 (2017), 254–65 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.03.001

Mozahem, Najib A., ‘The Online Marketplace for Business Education: An Exploratory Study’, International Journal of Management Education, 19.3 (2021), 100544 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100544

Palanissamy, Ayyappan, and R. Kesavamoorthy, ‘Automated Dispute Resolution System (ADRS) - A Proposed Initial Framework for Digital Justice in Online Consumer Transactions in India’, Procedia Computer Science, 165 (2019), 224–31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.01.087

Schmuck, Roland, ‘The Use of Online Business Models’, Procedia Manufacturing, 54 (2020), 45–51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.07.008

Uyumaz, Alper, and Kemal Erdoğan, ‘The Theory of Legal Clinic in Education of Law’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174 (2015), 2116–22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.010

Xu, Bing, Darong Huang, and Bo Mi, ‘Smart City-Based e-Commerce Security Technology with Improvement of SET Network Protocol’, Computer Communications, 154.December 2019 (2020), 66–74 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.024




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jmail.v2i1.62296

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Muthia Sakti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.