The Constitutionality of the TAP MPR’s Decisions in the Legislative Hierarchy
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of TAP MPR in Indonesia. Placement of MPR Provisions in Law No. 12 of 2011 on the hierarchy of Legislation in Indonesia becomes one of the problematics that needs to be discussed, on the grounds of the position of MPR provisions that are under exactly the Constitution of 1945. This is based on the position of the MPR Decree itself which will automatically become a reference to the rules under it, in accordance with the theory of stairs put forward by Hans Kelsen. Although from the point of view of the position of MPR determination is still understandable if Hans Nawiasky theory is used as the basis. But in terms of testing itself of course this will raise a big question mark for all of us because in the Constitution of 1945 institutions or institutions that have the right to conduct a test of the Law is the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, but within its own scope the Provision of MPR is outside the juridical territory of the two Institutions themselves. Therefore, there needs to be a solution if at any time the MPR Decree is not in accordance with the basis of the 1945 Constitution so that there will be no defects in one of the legal sources of the State of Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Affandi, Hernadi, ‘Prospek Kewenangan MPR Dalam Menetapkan Kembali Ketetapan MPR Yang Bersifat Mengatur’, Jurnal Hukum Positum, 1.1 (2016), 39–50 https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v1i1.526
Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, ‘Model Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY, 25.2 (2018), 247 https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v25i2.6005
Aulia, Farihan, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, ‘Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law Dan Islamic Law Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Dan Karakteristik Berpikir ’, Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25.1 (2017), 98–113 https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no4.2343
Chemin, Matthieu, ‘Can Judiciaries Constrain Executive Power? Evidence from Judicial Reforms’, Journal of Public Economics, 199 (2021), 104428 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104428
Christiani, Theresia Anita, ‘Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219 (2016), 201–7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006
Cohen, Alon, ‘Independent Judicial Review: A Blessing in Disguise’, International Review of Law and Economics, 37 (2014), 209–20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2013.10.006
Cordell, Larry, and Lauren Lambie-Hanson, ‘A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Judicial Foreclosure Delay and a Preliminary Look at New Mortgage Servicing Rules’, Journal of Economics and Business, 84 (2016), 30–49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2015.08.002
Dimyati, Khudzaifah, Haedar Nashir, Elviandri Elviandri, Absori Absori, Kelik Wardiono, and Arief Budiono, ‘Indonesia as a Legal Welfare State: A Prophetic-Transcendental Basis’, Heliyon, 7.8 (2021), e07865 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865
Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo, ‘Independence of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Norms and Practices’, Constitutional Review, 3.1 (2017), 71 https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev314
Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi, Lego Karjoko, and Abdul Kadir Jaelani, ‘Model Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Eksekutabilitas Dalam Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia’, Bestuur, 7.2 (2020), 36 https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v7i1.42700
Karakas, Leyla D., ‘Political Rents under Alternative Forms of Judicial Review’, International Review of Law and Economics, 52 (2017), 86–96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.08.004
Mahardika, Ahmad Gelora, ‘Politik Hukum Hierarki TAP MPR Melalui Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945’, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16.3 (2019), 344–52 https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v16i3.512
Pozas Loyo, Andrea, ‘What Is “Constitutional Efficacy”?: Conceptual Obstacles for Research on the Effects of Constitutions’, Mexican Law Review, 9.1 (2016), 23–44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.09.002
Pratiwi, Lintang Galih, ‘Kewenangan Uji Material (Judicial Review) Terhadap Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi’, SASI, 26.4 (2020) https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.268
Presentation, Session, ‘Parcours, Financement, Accréditation : L’organisation Des Soins En MPR’, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 56 (2013), e263 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2013.07.517
Riwukore, Jefirstson Richset, and Fellyanus Habaora, ‘Studi Keberadaan Tap Mpr Ri Dalam Konsep Negara Hukum Indonesia Pasca Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011’, Jurnal Abdimas Mandiri, 3.1 (2019), 30–35 https://doi.org/10.36982/jam.v3i1.727
Sati, Nisrina Irbah, ‘Ketetapan Mpr Dalam Tata Urutan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49.4 (2020), 834 https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no4.2343
Shah, Attaullah, Hamid Ali Shah, Jason M. Smith, and Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca, ‘Judicial Efficiency and Capital Structure: An International Study’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 44 (2017), 255–74 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.03.012
Silalahi, Wilma, ‘Penataan Regulasi Berkualitas Dalam Rangka Terjaminnya Supremasi Hukum’, Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 8.1 (2020), 56–66 https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.8.1.56-66
Silva, Jeovan Assis, and Tomas Aquino Guimaraes, ‘Factors Affecting Judicial Review of Regulatory Appeals’, Utilities Policy, 72.August (2021), 101284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101284
Sutarto, Dendi, ‘Epistemologi Keilmuan Integratif-Interkonektif M. Amin Abdullah Dan Resolusi Konflik’, Jurnal Trias Politika, 1.2 (2017), 2022 https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v1i2.1064
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jmail.v2i1.48204
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Brillian Gustama; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.