Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts

Zaidah Nur Rosidah

Abstract


This paper aims to find the basis for the philosophical rationality of applying sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes in religious courts as well as the prerequisites required by religious court judges to apply sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is normative legal research to find philosophical rationality and the institutionalization of sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. The research results obtained first, the philosophical rationality of the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in line with the first and third principles of Pancasila. Second, the institutionalization of sharia principles becomes effective if there are prerequisites that must be met, firstly enough information for judges to understand sharia principles, secondly the obstacles that come from the judges themselves who are still oriented towards the flow of legism / positivism will have an effect on providing legal basis and third the speed of instilling the institutionalization of sharia principles can be done through education and training organized by the Supreme Court for Religious Court judges.

Keywords


Limitation; Sharia principles; Disputes.

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Anwar, M., Yaswirman, Y., & Ulfanora, U. (2019). Dispute Resolution of Shariah Economy in Murahabah Financing Contract in Sahabat Mitra Sejati Cooperatives. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.768

Court, R., & Zuhroh, D. (2017). JUSTICEASPECT OFTHE SETTLEMENT DISPUTE INSHARIA BUSINESS THROUGH THE Fahmi Rusydi , Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah . Lihat. 12(4), 150–155.

Ferreira, C., Nery, A., & Pinheiro, P. R. (2016). A Multi-Criteria Model in Information Technology Infrastructure Problems. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.161

Hamzah, M., Hamid, A., & A. Tenri, F. (2019). Optimization of Justice Institutions in Cancellation of Sharia Arbitration Decisions. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(5), 250. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i5.1076

Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2013). Urgency of Regulatory Priorities Watershed in Order to Conduct an Integrated Watershed Administrative Law in Indonesia. The First International Conference on Law, Business and Government, 22–28.

Intaniasari, K. (2020). Gross Split Contract Framework Regulation on the Caring for People. Bestuur, 8(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i2.43141

Ishak, N., Hasibuan, R. R., & Arbani, T. S. (2020). Bureaucratic and Political Collaboration Towards a Good Governance System. Bestuur, 8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42922

Jaelani, A. Kadir, Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Isharyanto. (2019). Regulation of Regional Government on Halal Tourism Destinations in West Nusa Tenggara Province after Constitutional Court Decision Number 137/PUU-XIII/2015. 358(Icglow), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.27

Jaelani, Abdul Kadir, Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Karjoko, L. (2020a). Development of halal tourism destinations in the Era of regional autonomy in West Nusa Tenggara Province. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(12), 765–774.

Jaelani, Abdul Kadir, Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Karjoko, L. (2020b). Development of tourism based on geographic indication towards to welfare state. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3 Special Issue), 1227–1234.

Karjoko, L., Jaelani, A. K., Hukum, F., Maret, U. S., Hukum, F., & Riyadi, U. S. (2019). Jurnal Bestuur. 7(1).

Karjoko, L., Winarno, D. W., Rosidah, Z. N., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2020). Spatial planning dysfunction in East Kalimantan to support green economy. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(8), 259–269.

Luthviati, R. D., Registration, C., & Maret, U. S. (2020). Jurnal Bestuur. 8(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.43138

Minardi, A. (2020). Two Lane Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes Between Religious Court and National Sharia Arbitration Agency (BASYARNAS). Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 1(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v1i2.66

Musjtari, D. N., Radliyah, N., & Riyanto, B. (2019). The Mediation Process in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Through the Religious Court in Indonesia. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 24(5), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2405053947

Nurhayati, I., & Karjoko, L. (2019). Civil Relations Regulation After the Expiration of Building. 4(1), 28–34.

Otto, J. M. (2010). Sharia Incorporated : A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present. Sharia Incorporated : A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789087280574

Rosidah, Z. N. (2020). Coherence of the Rules of Sharia Against Pancasila. Bestuur, 8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42723

Setyowati, R., Purbasari, I., & Fauzan, E. M. (2018). Consumers spiritual rights in the islamic banking dispute out of court settlement in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(4), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.64249

Shomad, A., & Bintoro, R. W. (2018). Philosophical Foundation of Religious Court Competence Towards Encumbrance Right Execution. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 18(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.2.2063

Silvia, F., Leksono, K., & Anand, G. (2018). the Characteristics of Sharia Compliance in the Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes in Indonesia. 131(Iclgg 2017), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.2991/iclgg-17.2018.15

Triana, N. (2017). Reconstructing Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Based on Indonesian Muslim Society Culture. Ijtimā’iyya: Journal of Muslim Society Research, 2(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.24090/ijtimaiyya.v2i1.1099

Triana, N. (2018). Urgency of Arbitration Clause in Determining the Resolution of Sharia Economic Disputes. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v18i1.8872

Virgil, N., Nicoleta, O. A., & Florin, T. (2015). Protection of the European Energy Consumers’ Rights within the Globalization Context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 27(15), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01015-1

Wahyudi, F. (2019). the Quo Vadis of Banckrupty Settlement and Pkpu Laws on Sharia Banking. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.1-20

Wibowo, D. E. (2020). Ewuh Pakewuh Cultural Reconstruction to Equal Consumer Protection. Jurnal Bestuur, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.41395




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jmail.v1i1.44749

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Zaidah Nur Rosidah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.