BATU NISAN: POLA PENGRAJIN DAN KORELASINYA TERHADAP BUDAYA (Studi Kasus Kampung Gondang Kelurahan Manahan)

Okkie Pritha Cahyani, Hery S.J.N Sriiwiyanto, Yogi Pasca Pratama, Bhimo Rizky Samudro

Abstract

This study aims to (1) identify interaction’s pattern of crab’s man of gravestone with market agent (the market agent are crab’s man of gravestone, middleman and consumer), and non market agent (local government and the undertaker).(2) Describe the relation of Java’s culture with business continuity of crab’s man of gravestone in Gondang Village.The unit of analysis in this study is the interaction between crab’s man of gravestone with market agent and non market agent.The data in this study were collected by using several methods, namely unstructured interviews and in-depth interviews and non participant observation.

This study use qualitative method with phenomenology approach.The results showed that: (1) there were 5 interaction’s pattern between crab’s man of gravestone with market agents and non market agent (2) the Java’s culture has a big influence toward the business continuity of crab’s man of gravestone.

The recommendations idea that given for the crab’s man of gravestone are: (1) The crab’s man of gravestone should make an organization or association of crab’s man of gravestone, in order to have an agreement price directly between the fellow of crab’s man of gravestone. (2) Moreover, the local government should support the business continuity of crab’s man of gravestone directly, and they also should take an action resolutely toward persons who play a negative role in this gravestone’s business.

 

Keywords : crab’s man of gravestone, interaction, market agents and non market agents.

JEL Classification: M21, D02, Z12, L19

Full Text:

PDF

References

Danim, Sudarwan. (2002). Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Denzin, Norman K. Dan Yvonna S. Lincoln. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Donny. (2005). Fenomenologi dan Herme-neutika: Sebuah Perbandingan. Jurnal Eko-nomi Pembangunan.

Fukuyama, Francis. (1995). Trust : The Social Virtues and the Creation of Pros-perity. NY: Free Press.

Hasbullah, Jousairi. (2006). Sosial Capital (Menuju Keunggulan Budaya Manusia In-donesia). Jakarta: MR United Press.

Husserl, Edmund. (1962). Ideas: General Introduction to The Pure Phenomenology. United State of America: Collier Books Edition.

Koentjaraningrat. (2005). Manusia dan Ke-budayaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Koentjaraningrat. (1990). Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Pustaka Ja-ya.

Mawardi. (2007). Peranan Sosial Capital dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam Vol 3, Nomor 2.

Pratama, Y.P., Suman, A., Manzilati, A. Lahan Tetelan: Kajian Interaksi Simbolik Kemitraan Antara Perhutani dengan Ma-syarakat (Studi Kasus Desa Tambaksari, Kecamatan Sumbermanjing Wetan, Kabu-paten Malang). Jurnal Dinamika, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan. Vol. 8 No.29 halaman 1-32

Sarwono, Jonathan. (2006). Metode Pene-litian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakar-ta: Graha Ilmu.

Schutz, Alfred. (1970). On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: The Uni-versity of Chicago Press.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2002). Sosiologi Sua-ra Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Per-sada.

Sugiyono. (2005). Memahami Penelitian K-ualitatif. Bandung: ALFABET.

Sumbullah. (2012). Islam Jawa dan Akul-turasi Budaya: Karakteristik, Variasi, dan Ketaatan Ekspresif. Jurnal El harakah Vol. 14 No. 1.

Sutisna. (2002). Perilaku konsumen dan Komunikasi Pemasaran. Bandung: PT. Re-maja Rosdarkarya Offset.

Sutopo. (2006). Peneltian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Terapannya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret Su-rakarta.

Woolcoock, Michael. (1998). Social Cap-ital and Economic Development, Theory and Society 27 pp 151-208.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jiep.v15i1.9898

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.