BREAKING THE ACEH CONFLICT MEMORY INHERITANCE

Chaerol Riezal

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the extent to which the Aceh conflict involving the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia is narrated in history textbooks. Therefore, the narrative about the Aceh conflict and its reconciliation efforts as a critical discourse to decide the memories of the Aceh conflict that were passed down in history textbooks will be discussed in this paper. This research uses a qualitative approach. Data collection techniques are carried out using literature review and documentation, with textbooks on the history of the national curriculum in 2006 and 2013. The results showed that the legacy of Aceh's conflict memory is still retained in grade XII history textbooks. Representations of the Aceh conflict are narrated in some ways, and even the narrative tends to be negative. For this reason, reconciliation efforts as a critical discourse are needed to decide the legacy of the Aceh conflict. One effort that can be done is through the transformation of the Aceh conflict over the history textbooks. However, this reconciliation discourse needs to be criticized because it is often used in social science and not in the field of history learning.

Keywords

memory inheritance, Aceh conflict, GAM, Indonesia, historical textbooks.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Auliana, P.E. (2019). Campur Tangan Asing di Indonesia: Crisis Management Initiative dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Aceh (2005-2012). Historia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Peneliti Sejarah, Vol. II, No. 2, Hal. 83-90.

Amirullah, M. Hasbi. (2004). Perjuangan Ulama Aceh di Tengah Konflik.

Yogyakarta: Ceninnets Pers.

Chaidar, Al, dkk. (1999). Aceh Bersimpah Darah: Mengungkap Penerapan Status Daerah Operasi Militer (DOM) di Aceh 1989-1998. Jakarta: Pustaka Al kautsar.

Darma, Y.A. (2009). Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: CV. Yrama Widya. Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta:

LKis.

Fairclough, Norman. (1998). Languange and Power. London: Longman. Gardiner, Juliet. (1988). What Is History Today?. London: Macmillan Education. Ishak, Otto Syamsuddin. (2008). Dari Maaf ke Panik Aceh: Sebuah Sketsa

Sosiologi-Politik. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi Pers dan Pembangunan.

Ibrahim, dkk. (1991). Sejarah Daerah Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Jayanti, Kurnia. (2013). Konflik Vertika antara Gerakan Aceh Merdeka di Aceh dengan Pemerintah Pusat di Jakarta Tahun 1976-2005. Jurnal Al Turas, Vol. XIX, No. 1, Hal. 49-70.

KontraS. (2006). Aceh: Damai dengan Keadilan? Mengungkap Kekerasan Masa Lalu. Jakarta: KonstraS.

Latifah, Ai. (2018). Militer dan Konstruksi Identitas Nasional: Analisis Buku Teks Sejarah SMA Kelas XII KTSP 2006 (I Wayan Badrika). Historia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Peneliti Sejarah, Vol. I, No. 2, Hal. 83-88.

Lederach, J.P. (1995). Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. New York: Syracuse University Press.

Lederach, J.P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconcilaton in Devided Societies. Washington DC: Unitetd States Intitute of Peace.

Lederach, J.P. (2003). The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. STL Distribution North America.

Mulyana, Agus. (2013). Nasionalisme dan Militerisme: Ideologisasi Historiografi Buku Teks Pelajaran Sejarah SMA. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, Hal. 78-87.

Marwick, Athur. (1989). The Nature of History. London: Basil Blackwell. McCullagh, C. Behan. (1989). The Truth of History. London: Routeledge.

Mitchel, C. (2012). Beyond Resolution: What does Conflict Transformation actualy Transform? dalam Peace and Conflict Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, Hal. 1-22.

Nur, Fauziah, dkk. (2019). Evaluasi Isi/Materi Teks Sejarah Indonesia Kelas X Kurikulum 2013 Revisi 2017. Indonesian Journal of History Education, Vol. 7, No. 2, Hal. 115-128.

Nugraha, M.T. (2019). Rekonsiliasi Nilai-nilai Kepahlawanan serta Internalisasinya dalam Pendidikan Islam. Ta’dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, Vol. 8, No. 2, Hal. 241-258.

Purwanta, Hieronymus. (2013). Militer dan Konstruksi Identitas Nasional: Analisis Buku Teks Pelajaran Sejarah SMA Masa Orde Baru. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, Hal. 88-102.

Rogers, Rebecca. (2005). Critical Discourse Analysis in Education: A Review Literature. dalam Review of Educational Research, Vol. 75, No. 3, Hal. 365-416.

Sugeng, dkk. (2010). Transformasi Gerakan Aceh Merdeka: dari Kotak Peluru ke Kotak Suara (Sebuah Kisah Sukses Program Transformasi Kombatan di Aceh). Jakarta: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Indonesia Office.

Sjamsuddin, Helius. (2007). Metodologi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Utami, I.W.P dan Widiadi, A.N. (2016). Wacana Bhineka Tunggal Ika dalam Buku Teks Sejarah. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1, Hal. 106-117.

Utami, I.W.P. (2012). Wacana Ideologi Negara dalam Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) Sejarah Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA). Tesis. Tidak diterbitkan. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Wahyudi, Bambang. (2013). Resolusi Konflik Aceh: Kiprah Masyarakat Aceh Non GAM dalam Perdamaian di Serambi Mekkah Pasca MoU Helsinki. Jakarta: CV. Makmur Cahaya Ilmu.

Zuardi, dkk. (2010). Dialog Keude Kupi: Perspektif Sosial Demokrasi Rasa Kupi Aceh. Jakarta: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Indonesia Office.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.