This study aims to examine the effect of high performance work system (HPWS) and work engagement on employee creativity with work well-being as a mediator. This study uses quantitative methods by using primary data in collecting data obtained by distributing online questionnaires with google form. The number of respondents in this study were 80 respondents who worked in Solo Raya (Sukoharjo, Wonogiri, Karanganyar, Klaten, Boyolali). The data analysis technique used linear regression analysis using SPSS 22 software in processing the data. The results showed that the high-performance work system (HPWS) had a significant positive effect on work well-being. Work engagement has a significant positive effect on work well-being. High performance work system (HPWS) has a significant positive effect on employee creativity through work well-being as a mediator. Work well-being has a significant positive effect on employee creativity.

Keywords: High Performance Work System (HPWS), Work Engagement, Employees Creativity, Work Well-Being.


 Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh high performance work system (HPWS) dan work engagement terhadap employee creativity dengan work well-being sebagai pemediasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitaif dengan menggunakan data primer dalam pengambilan data yang diperoleh dengan cara menyebarkan kuesioner secara online melalui google form. Jumlah responden dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 80 responden yang bekerja di Solo Raya (Sukoharjo, Wonogiri, Karanganyar, Klaten, Boyolali). Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi linier dengan menggunakan software SPSS 22 dalam mengolah data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa high performance work system (HPWS) berpengaruh signifikan positif terhadap work well- being. Work engagement berpengaruh signifikan positif terhadap work well-being. High performance work system (HPWS) berpengaruh signifikan positif terhadap employee creativity melalui work well- being sebagai pemediasi. Work well-being berpengaruh signifikan positif terhadap employee creativity.

Kata kunci: High Performance Work System (HPWS), Work Engagement, Employee Creativity, Work Well-Being.

Full Text:



Al-ajlouni Mohammed Iqbal, 2020, Can high-performance work systems (HPWS) promote organisational innovation? Employee perspective-taking, engagement and creativity in a moderated mediation model. Employee Relations: The International Journal 43.2, 373-397.

Ariza-Montes, A., Hernández-Perlines F., Han H., & Law R., 2019, Human dimension of the hospitality industry: Working conditions and psychological well-being among European servers. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 41, 138-147.

Bakker, Arnold B., Demerouti Evangelia, Lieke L., 2012, Work engagement, performance, and active learning: The role of conscientiousness. Journal of vocational behavior 80.2, 555-564.

Barkema, H.G.; Chen, X.-P.; George, G., Luo, Y.; Tsui, A.S., 2015, West meets East: New concepts and theories, Acad. Manage. J. 58, 460–479.

Boxall, Peter, Macky Keith, 2014, High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being. Work, employment and society, 28.6: 963-984.

Cooper dan Schindler, 2014, Bussiners Research Method, McGrawHill, New York.

Creswell, John. W., 2009, Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Dagenais-Desmarais, Véronique, Savoie André, 2012, What is psychological well-being, really? A grassroots approach from the organizational sciences. Journal of Happiness Studies 13.4, 659-684.

Dewe Philip, Cooper Cary., 2012, Well-being and work: Towards a balanced agenda. Springer.

Diener, E., Sapyta J. J., & Suh E., 1998, Subjective well-being is essential to well-being, Psychological inquiry 9.1, 33-37.

Escribá-Carda, Naiara, Balbastre-Benavent Francisco, Canet-Giner, M. Teresa., 2017, Employees' perceptions of high-performance work systems and innovative behaviour: The role of exploratory learning. European Management Journal, 35.2: 273-281.

Evans, W.R. and Davis W.D., 2005, High-performance work systems and organizational performance: the mediating role of internal social structure, Journal of Management 31(5), 758-775.

Forgas, Joseph P., 1998, On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. Journal of personality and social psychology74.3, 565.

Huang, Liang-Chih, Ahlstrom D., Lee, A.Y.P., Chen, S.Y., Hsieh, M.J., 2016, High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: An empirical study. Personnel Review 45, 296–314.

Jackson, S.E., Schuler R.S., Jiang, K., 2014, An aspirational framework for strate.g.ic human resource management, Acad. Manage. Annals 8, 1–56.

Jensen, Jaclyn M., Patel Pankaj C., Messersmith Jake G., 2013, High-performance work systems and job control: Consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management 39.6, 1699-1724.

Joo, Baek-Kyoo, Yang Baiyin, Mclean Gary N., 2014, Employee creativity: The effects of perceived learning culture, leader–member exchange quality, job autonomy, and proactivity. Human Resource Development International, 17.3, 297-317.

Jyoti, Jeevan, Rani, Asha, 2019, Role of burnout and mentoring between high performance work system and intention to leave: Moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research 98, 166-176.

Kahn William A., 1990, Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of management journal 33.4, 692-724.

Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J. C., 2017, Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal 60.3, 1164-1188.

Miao Rentao, Cao Yi, 2019, High-performance work system, work well-being, and employee creativity: Cross-level moderating role of transformational leadership. International journal of environmental research and public health 16.9, 1640.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., 2001, On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, Annual review of psychology 52.1, 141-166.

Ryff, Carol D., Keyes, Corey Lee M., 1995, The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology 69.4, 719.

Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Taris Toon W., Bakker Arnold B., 2006, Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. Research companion to working time and work addiction, 193-217.

Sekaran, Uma, Bougie Roger, 2016, Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th Edition, Wiley, New Jersey.

Shin, S.J., Jeong I. and Bae J., 2018, Do high-involvement HRM practices matter for worker creativity? A cross-level approach, International Journal of Human Resource Management 29.2, 260-285.

Tierney, Pamela, Farmer Steven M., 2002, Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal 45.6, 1137-1148.

Tomer, John, 2011, Understanding High Performance Work Systems: The Joint Contribution of Economics and Human Resource Management.

Van Wingerden, Jessica, Van Der Stoep, Joost, 2018, The motivational potential of meaningful work: Relationships with strengths use, work engagement, and performance. PloS one, 13.6, e0197599.

Woodman, Richard W., Sawyer, John E., Griffin, Ricky W., 1993, Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review,18.2, 293-321.

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., & Ilies, R., 2012, Everyday working life: Explaining within-person fluctuations in employee well-being, Human relations 65.9, 1051-1069.

Yuwanto, Listyo, 25 September 2014, Self Leadership Dan Work Engagement,

Zhang, Jun-Cheng, Ling W. Q., Zhang Z. Y., Xie, J., 2015 Organizational commitment, work engagement, person–supervisor fit, and turnover intention: A total effect moderation model. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 43.10, 1657-1666.


  • There are currently no refbacks.