HOME INDUSTRY PAKAIAN DI PEDESAAN SUMATERA: MELIHAT SISI KESEJAHTERAAN SUBJEKTIF DAN DAMPAK KESEJAHTERAAN

Risma Nia, Muhammad Izzudin

Abstract

Subjective well-being is a cognitive assessment of life satisfaction, which means a comprehensive assessment of an individual's assessment of various areas of life in which he has lived well or not and an affective assessment of feelings and emotions that concurrently produce positive emotions (pleasant) and negative emotions (unpleasant). This study used descriptive qualitative research methods with a purposive selection of informants. The results showed that the subjective welfare felt by clothing home industry workers in Seri Tanjung Village was analyzed from the cognitive dimension and affective dimension, namely clothing home industry workers can meet their daily needs, comfortable with their work, want to improve the quality of family life, can relate well with fellow colleagues, have support from family, are optimistic about completing work or stitch targets,  and there are obstacles (negative emotions) in facing work such as customers want to change clothing models, orders are canceled, stitches and sequins are wrong, sewing machines are damaged, power goes out, targets are not met due to worker permits, and difficulty cutting batik patterns. Then the impact of the clothing home industry business for the clothing home industry workers is to have income (increase family income) and skills (open job opportunities).

 

Keywords: Subjective Well-Being, Clothing Industry Home Workers

 

Abstrak

Kesejahteraan subjektif (subjective well-being) adalah penilaian kognitif terhadap kepuasan hidup yang bermakna penilaian seorang individu secara menyeluruh terhadap berbagai bidang dalam kehidupan yang dijalaninya sudah berjalan baik atau tidak dan penilaian afektif terhadap perasaan dan emosi yang merangkap emosi positif (menyenangkan) dan emosi negatif (tidak menyenangkan). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dengan pemilihan informan secara purposive. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesejahteraan subjektif yang dirasakan pekerja home industry pakaian di Desa Seri Tanjung dianalisis dari dimensi kognitif dan dimensi afektif yaitu para pekerja home industry pakaian bisa mencukupi kebutuhan sehari-hari, nyaman atas pekerjaannya, ingin memperbaiki kualitas hidup keluarga, bisa berhubungan baik dengan sesama rekan kerja, ada dukungan dari keluarga, optimis menyelesaikan pekerjaan atau target jahitan, dan ada kendala (emosi negatif) dalam menghadapi pekerjaan seperti pelanggan ingin ganti model baju, orderan dibatalkan, hasil jahitan dan payetan salah, mesin jahit rusak, listrik padam, target tidak terpenuhi karena pekerja izin, dan kesulitan memotong batik pola. Kemudian dampak usaha home industry pakaian di Desa Seri Tanjung bagi pekerja home industry pakaian tersebut yaitu punya penghasilan (meningkatkan pendapatan keluarga) dan punya skill (membuka lapangan pekerjaan).

 

Kata Kunci: Kesejahteraan Subjektif, Pekerja Home Industry Pakaian

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alfiani, Asti Katrina. 2017. “Kesejahteraan Sosial Pekerja Perempuan Pada Industri Batik Di Kecamatan Talun Dalam Konteks Putting Out System.”

Amanaturrohim, H., & Widodo, J. (2016). Pengaruh Pendapatan Dan Konsumsi Rumah Tangga Terhadap Kesejahteraan Keluarga Petani Penggarap Kopi Di Kecamatan Candiroto Kabupaten Temanggung. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 5(2), 468-468.

Biswas, Dkk. 2007. Positif Psychology Coaching: Putting The Science Of Happiness To Work For Your Clients. Published By Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published Si multaneously In Canadaand Conform-ity: Metsiof Studies Using Asch.

Chamsyah, Bachtiar. (2008). Kesejahteraan (Welfare): Reinventing Pembangunan Sosial untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Indonesia. Jakarta: Trisakti University Press.

Compton, William C. 2005. Introduction to Positive Psychology. USA: Thomson Learning.

Creswell W. John. 2014. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Deci, Edward. L dan Richard M. Ryan. (2008). Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and Well- Being: An Introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies. 9. 1-4.

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55(1), 34.

Diener, E. 2009. The Science of Well-Being The Collected Works of Ed Diener. USA: Springer.

Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630903900402

Ernawati, S., & Kholid, A. (2012). Semangat kerja karyawan ditinjau dari konsep penerimaan diri. Talenta, 1(1), 43-57

Fadli, Muhammad Rijal. 2021. “Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.” 21(1): 33–54.

Gonzalez, J. L., & Basabe, N. (2000). Sociocultural factors predicting subjective experience of emotion: a collective level analysis. Psicothema, 12, 55-69.

Https://kecamatantanjungbatu.blogspot.com/2011/09/profil-desa-seritanjung-kecamatan.html. Diakses pada 26 Februari 2023, pukul 21:09.

Jati Ariati. 2010. “Subjective Well-Being (Kesejahteraan Subjektif) Dan Kepuasan Kerja Pada Staf Pengajar (Dosen) Di Lingkungan Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Diponegoro.”

Kahneman, Daniel; Ed Diener, dan Norbert Schwarz. (1999). Well-Being The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Krisnawati, Riska. 2013. “Kesejahteraan Subjektif (Subjective Well-Being) Buruh Pabrik (Studi Deskriftif Pada Buruh PT. Laksana Teknik Makmur Kabupaten Bogor).” (0806945).

Lexy J. Moleong, (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung, PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Subjective well-being. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 471–484). The Guilford Press.

Murti Mujamiasih, Rahmawati Prihastuty, dan Sugeng Hariyad. 2013. “Subjective Well-Being (SWB): Studi Indigenous Karyawan Bersuku Jawa.” 2(2): 36–42.

Muslimah. 2020. “Pengaruh Usaha (Taylor) Penjahit Pakaian Terhadap Peningkatan Pendapatan Keluarga Di Desa Jaddih Socah Bangkalan.” Skripsi.

Nurharisiya, Lamna. 2021. “Gambaran Kesejaheraan Subjektif Pada Buruh Bongkar Muat Di Perawang (Studi Deskriptif Pada Anggota Federasi Serikat Pekerja Transport Indonesia).”

Qonitatin, Novi. Faturochman. Avin Fadilla Helmi. Badrun Kartowagiran. (2020). Relasi Remaja Orang Tua Dan Ketika Teknologi Masuk Di Dalamnya The Adolescent Parent Relationships And When Technology Gets Involved. Buletin Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Vol. 28, No. 1.

Rohmansyah, Abu Bakhtiar. 2019. “Kesejahteraan Subjektif Pada Petani Di Lahan Industri.”

Seligman, Martin EP. (2005). Menciptakan Kebahagaiaan dengan Psikologi Positif Authentic Happiness. Bandung: Mizan.

Sheldon, K M. Houser Marko L.. (2001). Self Condordance, Goal Attainment And The Persuit Of Happiness: Can There Be An Upward Spiral? Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology. Vol. 80, No. 1.

Siedlecki, K.L., Salthouse, T.A., Oishi, S., & Jeswani, S. (2014). The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Well-Being Across Age. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 31-48.

Sintiawati, A. (2017). Hubungan Dukungan Sosial Dan Kepuasan Hidup (Life Satifaction) Pada Remaja Panti Asuhan Di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Universitas Islam Indonesia. Vol. 1, No. 1.

Sirgy, Joseph. (2012). The Psychology of Quality of Life: Hedonic Well-Being, Life Satisfaction and Eudaimonia (Second Edition). USA: Springer.

Sumarnonugroho, T. (1984). Sistem Intervensi Kesejahteraan Sosial. Yogyakarta: PT. Hanindita Offset

Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20, 333-354.

Wright, T. A., & Bonnet, D. G. (2007). Job Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being as Nonadditive Predictors of Workplace Turnover. Journal of Management, 33, 141-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206306297582

Yogi Prana Izza, Lc., MA. 2020. Teori Konflik Dialektika Ralf Dahrendorf. At-Tuhfah: Jurnal Studi Keislaman. Vol. 9, No. 1.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.