DIALEKTIKA SPASIAL DAN PRODUKSI BEAUTIFIKASI RUANG KOTA TERHADAP PELAKU AKTIVITAS EKONOMI INFORMAL

Farrah Eva Nabila

Abstract

The narrative of verticality or formalization that is applied exclusively causes shifts that are not optimal socially, culturally, economically, and politically towards the perpetrators of informal economic activities in the battlefield. This study aims to describe the spatial dialectic and the production of urban space beautification towards informal economic activity actors resulting from verticality or formalization of the fostered trader groups who are marginalized in the perspective of Henry Lafebvre including the dimensions of spatial practice, representation of space, and representation of space. This study uses a qualitative method with a library research model, through the collection of primary data sources and secondary data. Data collection techniques are carried out using the documentation method, namely studying and searching for relevant data. The data analysis technique used is data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The research results show that space facilitated by the State refers to the spatial concept that the representation of space is a spatial concept that practices the rationality of the State. The line of space used is not in accordance with the characteristics of the figures of fostered traders. Through the images and symbols that exist in the space created by the State, the group of fostered traders is controlled and controlled through alternative policies or formalization. The recommendations that can be generated are formalization that can be evaluated accurately against the formalization of reality and its impact in an effort to recognize and respond to the verticality transition conditions of the assisted trader group. With the confirmation of their vulnerability, creating formalization as a pursuit of modern and inclusive urban space development.

Keywords: Space, Formalization, Modernity, Street Vendors, Urban

 

Abstrak
Narasi vertikalitas atau formalisasi yang diterapkan secara ekslusif menyebabkan pergeseran yang tidak optimal secara sosial ekonomi, budaya, serta politik terhadap pelaku aktivitas ekonomi informal di ruang perkotaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dialektika spasial dan produksi beautifikasi ruang kota terhadap pelaku aktivitas ekonomi informal yang dihasilkan melalui vertikalitas atau formalisasi terhadap kelompok pedagang binaan yang terpinggirkan dalam perspektif Henry Lafebvre meliputi dimensi praktik spasial, representasi dari ruang, serta ruang representasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan model library research, melalui pengumpulan sumber data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan menggunakan metode dokumentasi, yaitu mempelajari dan mencari data-data yang relevan. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ruang yang difasilitasi Negara mengacu pada konsep conceived space bahwa representasi ruang merupakan konsep ruang yang mempraktikan rasionalitas Negara dampaknya ruang yang digunakan tidak sesuai dengan karakteristik dari kelompok pedagang binaan. Melalui citra-citra dan simbol-simbol yang ada di dalam ruang yang diciptakan Negara itu, kelompok pedagang binaan dikontrol dan dikendalikan melalui alternatif kebijakan atau formalisasi. Rekomendasi yang dapat dihasilkan adalah formalisasi dapat dievaluasi secara akurat terhadap realitas formalisasi beserta dampak dalam upaya mengakui dan merespon kondisi transisi vertikalitas kelompok pedagang binaan. Dengan adanya konfirmasi atas kondisi kerentanan mereka, menciptakan formalisasi sebagai pengejaran pembangunan ruang kota modern serta inklusif.

Kata Kunci: Ruang, Formalisasi, Modernitas, Pedagang Kaki Lima, Perkotaan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Affairs, Social. 2021. “Informality and the Achievement of SDGs.” 1–46.

Al-Jundi SA, Al-Janabi HA, Salam MA, Bajaba S and Ullah S. 2022. “The Impact of Urban Culture on Street Vending: A Path Model Analysis of the General Public's Perspective”. Front. Psychol. 12:831014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.831014

Amin, Nurul. 2017. “Comparative Advantage of Urban Economy : Policy Implications to Contain Inequity , Poverty and Environmental Degradation in The.” (February):17–18.

Andy Fefta Wijaya, Fadel Muhammad, Marta Trifena Patriot, and Asti Amelia Novita. 2021. “The Implementation of Street Vendor Relocation Policy in the Pro-Environmental Era in Mojokerto City Square.” The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning 2(2):145–59. doi: 10.46456/jisdep.v2i2.155.

Aotama, Reynaldo Christian, and Deavy Rosaline Henny Klavert. 2021. “Dampak Sosial Relokasi Pedagang Kaki Lima Di Kawasan Wisata Kuliner Kota Tomohon.” SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 18(1):1–9. doi: 10.21831/socia.v18i1.37719.

Armansyah, Sukamdi, and A. J. Pitoyo. 2019. “Informal Sector – a Survival or Consolidation Livelihood Strategy: A Case Study of the Informal Sector Entrepreneurs in Palembang City, Indonesia.” Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences 95(11):104–10. doi: 10.18551/rjoas.2019-11.13.

Armansyah, and Mirna Taufik. 2018. “Populasi Representasi Perempuan Pekerja Migran Menurut Laki-Laki Di Kota Palembang Representation of Women Migrant Workers by Men in Palembang City.” Populasi 26(1):26–38.

Banks, Nicola, Melanie Lombard, and Diana Mitlin. 2020. “Urban Informality as a Site of Critical Analysis.” Journal of Development Studies 56(2):223–38. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1577384.

Biqiku, Klea. 2023. “Random Individual Facades , Informal Buildings and Aesthetic Chaos : How Can Urban Architecture Help - The Case of Tirana ,.” 8385(June):84–94.

Chawla, Suthida. 2017. “Informal yet Disciplined? Thai Government Policies On Street Food Vendors of Yoawarat Road, Bangkok.” (December).

Dell’Anno, Roberto. 2021. “Inequality and Informality in Transition and Emerging Countries.” IZA World of Labor (April):1–11. doi: 10.15185/izawol.325v2.

Dwisusanto, Yohannes Basuki, and Ruth Dea Juwita. 2022. “Materialise Thirdspace Through Socio-Spatial Integration (Cases of Study: Thamrin 10, Jalan H. Agus Salim, Jalan Percetakan Negara, and Jalan Kramat Raya).” DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment) 49(2):105–16. doi: 10.9744/dimensi.49.2.105-116.

Espinosa, Horacio, and Marta Contijoch. 2021. “Public Space and Its Discontents. Informality and Urban Conflict.” AIBR, Revista de Antropologia Iberoamericana 16(02). doi: 10.11156/aibr.160203e.

Faruk. (2020). Ruang Kota Yogyakarta dalam perspektif produksi ruang Henri Lefebvre. Dalam Udasmoro, W. Gerak Kuasa: Politik Wacana, Identitas, dan Ruang/Waktu dalam Bingkai Kajian Budaya dan Media (257–292). KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia).

Gengzhi, S., Basha, N. K., Ramachandran, S., Gu, J., Liu, M., & Zhang, P. 2022. “The Revised Effect on Community Residents’ Perception and Support in Rural Historical Tourism: The Case of Qintong Ancient Town.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism 11(1):1–39.

Grainger, Garrett L. 2022. “Seeing like a Shadow State: An Ethnography of Homeless Street Outreach in the USA.” Urban Geography 1–21. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2022.2093051.

Hidayati, Nurani Nurul, and Nurini Nurini. 2014. “Kajian Formalisasi PKL Di Kawasan Pasar Waru Semarang.” Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota 10(4):376. doi: 10.14710/pwk.v10i4.8165.

Holgersen, Ståle. 2017. “David Harvey: Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism.” Agora 34(2–03):265–81. doi: 10.18261/issn1500-1571-2016-02-03-13.

ILO. 2020. “Krisis COVID-19 Dan Sektor Informal: Respons Langsung Dan Tantangan Kebijakan.” International Labour Organization 1–10.

Irwan, Sudarisman, Mustafa Muhizam, and Mohd Isa Mohd Hafizal. 2019. “Effects of Intervention of Street Vendors on Public Spaces of Tegalega Park, Bandung, Indonesia.” International Journal of Property Sciences 9(1):12–26. doi: 10.22452/ijps.vol9no1.2.

Journal, P. C. D., and Volume Viii. 2020. “Power , Conflict and Democracy In South and Southeast Asia.” VIII(1).

Lee, So Yoon. 2021. “An Urban Explanation of Jokowi’s Rise: Implications for Politics and Governance in Post-Suharto Indonesia.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 40(2):293–314. doi: 10.1177/1868103421990853.

Maela, Bening Hesti, Suryo Sakti Hadiwijoyo, and Daru Purnomo. 2022. “Representasi Ruang Terbuka Hijau Kawasan Sumber Mata Air Kali Benoyo Dalam Perspektif Henri Lefebvre.” Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 11(1):30–48. doi: 10.20961/jas.v11i1.55747.

Malasan, Prananda Luffiansyah. 2019. “The Untold Flavour of Street Food: Social Infrastructure as a Means of Everyday Politics for Street Vendors in Bandung, Indonesia.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 60(1):51–64. doi: 10.1111/apv.12217.

Malik, Abdul. 2018. “Ruang Publik Sebagai Representasi Kebijakan Dan Medium Komunikasi Publik (Studi Komunikasi Kebijakan Ruang Publik Kota Serang).” Sawala 6(2):82–88.

Minanto, Ali. 2018. “Kota, Ruang, Dan Politik Keseharian: Produksi Dan Konsumsi Ruang Bersenang-Senang Dalam Geliat Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Komunikasi 13(1):41–56. doi: 10.20885/komunikasi.vol13.iss1.art3.

Nogueira, Mara, and Hyun Bang Shin. 2022. “The ‘Right to the City Centre’: Political Struggles of Street Vendors in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.” City 26(5–6):1012–28. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2022.2126208.

Novitasari, Rika, and Debrina Rahmawati. 2020. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Sektor Informal UD. Gangsar Di Desa Ngunut Kecamatan Ngunut Kabupaten Tulungagung.” 13(2):115–24.

Nurany, Fierda. 2021. “The Policy Instruments of Street Vendor Relocation in Surabaya Bulak Fish Center.” Dia 19(1):68–84. doi: 10.30996/dia.v19i1.4800.

Pitoyo, Agus Joko, Bagas Aditya, and Ikhwan Amri. 2020. “The Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic to Informal Economic Sector in Indonesia: Theoretical and Empirical Comparison.” E3S Web of Conferences 200. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202020003014.

Polese, Abel. 2015. “Informality Crusades: Why Informal Practices Are Stigmatized, Fought and Allowed in Different Contexts According to an Apparently Understandable Logic.” Caucasus Social Science Review (CSSR) 2(1):1–26.

Polese, Abel. 2021. “What Is Informality? (Mapping) ‘the Art of Bypassing the State’ in Eurasian Spaces - and Beyond.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 00(00):1–43. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2021.1992791.

Prastyo, Rebdra Dwi. 2019. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Informal Di Indonesia.” 4–5.

Putra, Ghoustanjiwani Adi. 2019. “Privatisasi Dalam Ruang Publik Studi Kasus : Taman Merbabu Malang.” 69–78.

Rosaldo, Manuel. 2021. “Problematizing the ‘Informal Sector’: 50 Years of Critique, Clarification, Qualification, and More Critique.” Sociology Compass 15(9). doi: 10.1111/soc4.12914.

Sariffuddin, Sariffuddin, Hadi Wahyono, and Brotosunaryo Brotosunaryo. 2017. “Street Vendors Hypergrowth: Consequence of Uncontrolled Urbanization In Semarang City.” KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture 9(1):81–91. doi: 10.15294/komunitas.v9i1.8497.

Silitongo, Tifani. 2021. “Analisis Dampak Ekonomi Implementasi Kebijakan Revitalisasi Pasar Tradisional (Studi Kasus Pada Revitalisasi Pasar Tanggul Surakarta).” Mahasiswa Wacana Publik 1:398–415.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.