THE IDENTITY-ORIENTED: ANALYSING THE POWER OF #MEETOO IN INDIA’S GENDER JUSTICE SOCIAL MOVEMENT
Abstract
This study examines the #MeToo movement in India as a form of digital activism advancing gender justice. Despite legal reforms such as the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and the POSH Act (2013), institutional protections for women remain insufficient, particularly within informal sectors. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach and drawing upon secondary data, the research utilises Melucci’s theory of new social movements and Hunt and Benford’s identity-oriented framework to analyse how the movement constructs collective identity, fosters emotional solidarity, and mobilises moral commitment. The findings reveal that #MeToo in India enabled survivors to transform personal experiences of sexual violence into a shared collective narrative, using digital platforms as both spaces of testimony and resistance. The movement exposed structural inequalities, particularly caste- and class-based exclusions, while simultaneously disrupting dominant narratives through acts of online solidarity and public accountability. However, challenges persist in ensuring intersectional inclusivity and bridging the gap between digital mobilisation and institutional change. Theoretically, this article contributes to scholarship on social movements by highlighting how digital platforms facilitate identity-based mobilisation in contexts of legal and structural deficiency. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the Indian #MeToo movement illustrates both the emancipatory potential and the structural limits of digital feminist activism in advancing inclusive gender justice.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ansari, B. &. Rajaram, S. 2024. “It’s Women’s Day, but on the Ground, Little Has Changed.” https://www.isdm.org.in/blog/its-womens-day-but-on-ground-little-has-changed.
Bajpai, Vidya. 2020. “Caste System in India: An Overview.” Lucknow University.
Baxi, Pratiksha. 2014. Understanding Rape Law Reform. Vol. 58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264457042.
Bennett, Vivienne. 2019. “Russia’s #MeToo Movement Is Not Like the West’s — And That’s Exactly the Problem.” Time Magazine, July 26.
Bhattacharyya, R. 2019. “India Inc Reports 14% Rise in Sexual Harassment Complaints in FY19 .” The Economic Times, September 25.
Burke, T. 2017. “#MeToo Was Started for Black and Brown Women and Girls. They’re Still Being Ignored.” The Washington Post, November 9.
Butler, Judith. 2021. Excitable Speech; A Politics of the Performative. 1st Edition. London: Routledge.
Chachra, M. 2017. “Despite Law, 70% Working Women Do Not Report Workplace Sexual Harassment; Employers Show Poor Compliance.” India Spend, March 4.
Drewett, Chloe, Melissa Oxlad, and Martha Augoustinos. 2021. “Breaking the Silence on Sexual Harassment and Assault: An Analysis of #MeToo Tweets.” Computers in Human Behavior 123:106896. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106896.
Fileborn, B. &. Loney-Howes, R. 2019. #MeToo and the Politics of Social Change. edited by B. Fileborn and R. Loney-Howes. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Fraser, Nancy. 2009. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Columbia University Press.
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Goldsmith, B. &. Beresford, M. 2018. “EXCLUSIVE - India Most Dangerous Country for Women with Sexual Violence Rife - Global Poll.” Thomson Reuters Foundation News, June 26.
Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs. 2024. Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.
Gupta, Pallavi, Nikhat Fatima, and Sandeep Kandikuppa. 2021. “Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Act: Providing Redress or Maintaining Status Quo?” Social Change 51(2):246–57. doi:10.1177/0049085720957753.
Hooks, Bell. 2000. Feminism Is for Everybody : Passionate Politics. Cambridge: South End Press.
Hunt, Scott A., and Robert D. Benford. 2007. “Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment.” Pp. 433–57 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISS Blog Bliss. 2025. “Mobilizing against Patriarchy and Caste on Twitter: How Women in India Use Digital Spaces to Speak up against Gender-Based Violence.” https://issblog.nl/2025/03/27/mobilizing-against-patriarchy-and-caste-on-twitter-how-women-in-india-use-digital-spaces-to-speak-up-against-gender-based-violence/.
John, Mary E. 2020. “Feminism, Sexual Violence and the Times of #MeToo in India.” Asian Journal of Women’s Studies 26(2):137–58. doi:10.1080/12259276.2020.1748259.
Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge University Press.
Mendes, Kaitlynn, Jessica Ringrose, and Jessalynn Keller. 2018. “#MeToo and the Promise and Pitfalls of Challenging Rape Culture through Digital Feminist Activism.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 25(2):236–46. doi:10.1177/1350506818765318.
Naik, Dr. Manjushree Ganapathi. 2020. “Mainstream Media’s FRAMING of #METOO CAMPAIGN IN INDIA.” Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies 9(1):79. doi:10.17583/generos.2020.4902.
Nigam, Shalu. 2014. “Violence, Protest and Change: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Extraordinary Mobilization after the 2012 Delhi Gang Rape Case.” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2484641.
Ohlheiser, A. 2017. “The Woman behind ‘Me Too’ Knew the Power of the Phrase When She Created It – 10 Years Ago.” The Denver Post, October 19.
Pan, A. 2023. “Gender, Caste and Subjectivity: Revisiting the #MeToo Movement in India.” Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. doi:https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/12881.
Panda, Manisha, and Debi Prasad Das. 2024. “#MeToo Movement in India: Sexual-Violence, Casteism and Gender Bias.” Migration Letters 21(S4):1485–94. www.migrationletters.com.
Pandey, G. &. Sebastian, M. 2024. “Rampant Harassment and No Toilets: Report Exposes Kerala Film Industry.” BBC, August 24.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2014. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.
Polletta, Francesca, and James M. Jasper. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 283–305.
Pundir, P. 2019. “India’s #MeToo Moment Was Groundbreaking, but What Has Changed a Year After?” Vice, October 8.
Roy, S. S., O. Gilbar, C. Palantza, M. Davis, and S. Nilizadeh. 2023. “Exploring Gender-Based Toxic Speech on Twitter in Context of the #MeToo Movement: A Mixed Methods Approach.” ArXiv 1–9.
Rusmanto, Joni. 2013. Gerakan Sosial Sejarah Perkembangan Teori Kekuatan Dan Kelemahannya. Zifatama Publishing.
Sanyal, Madhurima. 2023. Caste and Gender Backlash: A Study of the #MeToo Movement in Tertiary Education in Kolkata, India. doi:10.19088/BACKLASH.2023.001.
Sarwono, J. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Seales, R. 2018. “What Has #MeToo Actually Changed?” BBC, May 12.
Sedysheva, A. 2020. Did #MeToo Skip Russia?
Sharma, S. 2024. “MeToo Movement In India: A Timeline Of Key Events.” Outlook, January 18.
Shroff, V. 2020. PoSH Act in the #MeToo Era.
Sidiq, Umar, and M. M. Choiri. 2019. METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DI BIDANG PENDIDIKAN. edited by A. Mujahidin. Ponorogo: CV. Nata Karya.
Sinclair, Rob. 2025. “Epistemic Injustice.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sonkar, Madhulika, Ishita Soorma, and Sreshtha Akanksha. 2020. “Social Media and the Mobilization of Collective Action on Sexual Violence against Women: A Case Study of the ‘#MeToo’ Movement in India.” Vantage: Journal of Thematic Analysis 1(1):66–74. doi:10.52253/vjta.2020.v01i01.07.
Strakhovskaya, O. 2021. “MeToo: Как Менялось Отношение к Сексуальному Насилию.” The Blueprint, March 6.
Sukmadinata, N. S. 2005. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dengan PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sukmana, Oman. 2016. Konsep Dan Teori Gerakan Sosial. Malang: Intrans Publishing.
The Week. 2018. “#MeToo Movement: India Overtakes US with Most Mentions in the World.” The Week, October 16.
Ungender Blog Team. 2022. “How Local Committees Neglect Women in the Informal Sector?” https://www.ungender.in/local-committee-women-in-informal-sector-india/.
Zed, M. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.