HARMONISASI FUNGSI DPD DAN DPR PADA LEMBAGA PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DALAM SISTEM BIKAMERAL GUNA PELAKSANAAN CHECKS AND BALANCES

Titik Triwulan Tutik

Abstract

Thisstudyis a normative legal research. Thestudyaims to examine the function ofharmonization between DPD and the DPR in agency representatives in bicameralsystem. Approachis used in this study are the historical, the statute, the comparative, the conceptual, and the case approach. Datacollection bycollecting
primary legal materialsand secondary. Primary legal materialsstudied and identifiedwith the "Irac", while secondary legal materialsare accounted forusing the cardsystem, whichis based on the research subject. These materials are searched legal relationship between one and the other uses reasoning (analysis)
deductive and inductive to generate propositions and concepts, either the definition, description, and classification as a resultof research. Deductiveanalysis starts from the provisionsmade UUDNR11945 and with the supportofsecondary legal materials including literature of constitutional law concerning state agency DPD. The results show that the first, DPD as state agencies in a bicameral system is formulated as a representative body ofthe people who are institutionally have equal footing with the DPR, even in terms of the representation of characterbased on regions, DPD has a broader representation of the character of the DPR because the dimensions ofrepresentativeness based to all the people who are in these areas. Second, the DPD as a representative body of the people have the duty and authority as the DPR, which has the function of the budget, legislation, and despite the limited supervision. Third, in the context of constitutional Indonesia, there is no synchronization and harmonization ofthe position and function of the DPD and DPR, it weakened the state DPD function as a state institution.

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.