KONTRIBUSI KRIMINOLOGI UNTUK AHLI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MEMBERIKAN LEGAL OPINION DAN KETERANGAN AHLI TERHADAP PENANGANAN PERKARA PIDANA

Rehnalemken Ginting

Abstract

Anycorruption casesfound in Indonesia need to behandledseriouslyby those who uphold the law, in this case: police, attorney, andjudicialaffairs. Forsolong, the handlings ofthe corruption cases tend togo far beyond the justice that finally the society lose their trust to those agencies. In order to anticipate that situation and condition, the expert's explanations are needed to look atthe corruption cases scientifically. The expert's explanations are usuallyrelated to constitutional lawandcriminal law, while some otherexpert's explanations are the expert's explanations from the people who work in BPKandBPKP to see whether or not there is a detriment
In general, the explanation from the constitutional law expert isneeded to see that the misuse ofthe authorityisacriminalact, while the explanation from the criminallaw expertisneeded to define whether the corruption is consideredas a criminal act ornot. Furthermore, to deepen andbroaden the analysis that isdone bythe criminal law expert, criminology is needed. Thus, a certain corruption case is then analyzed not only basedoncriminology study and but also criminal law study. The method that was used to conduct this research was doctrinal research, which wasalso basedon  sociologyandanalyzeddescriptively. Basedon theresult oftheresearch, itcouldbe concluded thata criminal lawexpert, ingiving legal opinions and any expert's explanations,  shouldbeable convince that the corruption isa criminal act. The
using ofcriminology as the auxiliary studies ofcriminal law would help the expert to present a scientific analysis towardthe corruption case.

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.