PENERAPAN INTEGRASI SINTAKS INKUIRI DAN STAD (INSTAD) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI SISWA KELAS VII-D SMPN 27 SURAKARTA

BASKORO ADI PRAYITNO, Bowo Sugiharto, Wahyu Wahyu

Abstract

Based on our observation to student and discussion with biology teacher of SMPN 27 Surakarta on April 15, 2010, known that there were complicated problems in Biology class VII-D. The core of those problems was most of the students’ ability on higher order thinking was still lower, therefore, in this research we want to try to solve the problems by classroom action research (CAR). Some studies shown that applying syntax of inquiry and STAD model have many advantages to solve this problem. Hence, these models was applied in this school. The research was conducted during 7 months, start from April until November 2010. The research design was Classroom Actions Research by Kemis and Taggart model, which consist of four phases, i.e. planning of action, doing the action, observation, and reflection. The result of this research showed that applying syntax of integrated inquiry and STAD model can improve the student ability on higher order thinking at Biology classes of grade VII SMPN 27 Surakarta.

Keywords

Inquiry; STAD; INSTAD; Higher Order Thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, L.W & Kratwol D.R. (2000). a Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. (Oline), (http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/curric/newtaxonomi.htm, diakses 5 Februari 2009)

Bilqin, I. (2009). The Effects of Guided Inquiry Instruction Incorporating a Cooperative Learning Approach on University Students Achievement of Acid and Bases Concepts and Attitude toward Guided Inquiry Instruction. Scientific Research and Essay, 4 (10): 1038-1046.

Bodrova, E & Leong, J.D. (2000). Scaffolding Emergent Writing in The Zone Proximal Development. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3 (2): 1-18.

Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Amstrong, N, & Hallar, B. (2009). Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3 (2): 1-22.

Dirks, C & Cunningham, M. (2006). Enhancing Diversity in Science: is Teaching Science Process Skills The Answer? CBE Life Science Educations, 5 (2): 2218-226.

Joyce, B & Weil, M. (2000). Models of Teaching. 5th Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Jufri, W. (2007). Pengaruh Implementasi Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri (PPBI) dengan Strategi Kooperatif terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Sikap, dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa SMA Negeri di Kota Mataram. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Kasbolah, K., (1999). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas untuk Guru Sains. Makalah dalam Seminar Penelitan Guru Sains dengan Pendekatan STM. Malang 12-15 Juli.

Lord, T. R. (2001). 101 Reasons for Using Cooperative Learning in Biology Teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 63 (1): 30-37.

Mei, G. (2007). Promoting Science Process Skill and The Relevance of Science through Science Alive. Proceedings of The Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge, and Understanding, Singapore, 28-30 Mei.

Prayitno, B.A., (2010). Potensi Pembelajaran Biologi Inkuiri dipadu Kooperatif dalam Pemberdayaan Berpikir dan Keterampilan Proses Sains pada Siswa Akademik Bawah. Makalah dalam Seminar Nasional Optimalisasi Sains untuk Memberdayakan Manusia, Program Studi Pendidikan Sains PPS Unesa, Surabaya, 16 Januari.

Phillips, K.A & Germann, P. J. (2002). The Inquiry “I” a Tool for Learning Scientific Inquiry. The American Biology Teacher, 67 (7): 512-520.

Slavin, R.E. (2005). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. London: Allen and Bacon.

Lu, C., Hong, J & Tseng, Y. (2007). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Based Learning by Scaffolding. Proceedings of The Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge, and Understanding, Singapore, 28-30 Mei.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.