Pengembangan Modul Berbasis POE (Predict, Observe, and Explain) Disertai Roundhouse Diagram untuk Memberdayakan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Menjelaskan Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Surakarta (Penelitian dan Pengembangan Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014)

NITA NURAINI, PUGUH KARYANTO, Suciati Sudarisman

Abstract

The objective of this development research was to know: 1) a product- learning module based POE (Prediction, Observation and Explanation) with Roundhouse Diagram (RD) to empowering 10th grade student’s science process skills and student’s explaining abilities of State Senior High School 5 Surakarta; 2) the feasibility of module based POE with RD to empowering 10th grade student’s science process skills and student’s explaining abilities of State Senior High School 5 Surakarta; 3) the effectiveness of module based POE with RD to empowering 10th Grade student’s science process skills and student’s explaining abilities of State Senior High School 5 Surakarta. This research used Research and Development (R&D) method which refers to the development of Borg and Gall modification. The sample used in the research development are early: 1) field trial sample consisting of 6 validators; 2) The main field trial sample consisting 10 students and 1 teacher; 3) operational field trial sample consisting of 32 students. The intsrumen used in the research are questionnaire, observation, interview and test. The operational field trial used one group pretest-posttest design. Science process skills and explaining abilities data are tested by paired t-test and counted by normalized N-gain. Based on the results of research it can be concluded that: 1) the development of module based on POE with RD using a modified Borg and Gall’s development model through some steps that are research and collecting information, planning, develop a preliminary form of the product, preliminary field testing, the main product revision, playing field testing, product revision operations, field operations, final product revition, dissemination and implementation; 2) the feasibility of module based on POE with RD which is developed at the trial is categorized as good by the expert, very good by the practitioners and good by the students as well; 3) the effectiveness of module based on POE with RD is significantly increased as medium categorized in empowering science process skills and high categorized in empowering the ability to explain.

Keywords

Module Development; POE; RD; Science Process Skills; Explaining Abilities

Full Text:

PDF

References

Budiningsih, A. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Borg & gall. (1989). Education Research, An Introduction. New York & London: Longman Inc. Choksy.

Costu, Bayram, Ayas, A. & Niaz, M. (2011). Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-based teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation. Journal Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 40:47–67

Dimyati & Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA

Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional Method: A Six-Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Cours. Am. J.Phus. vol. 66: 64-74

Horsley, Mike, B. K. & Huntly, H. (2010). The Role of Textbooks and Other Teaching and Learning Resources in Higher Education in Australia:

Change and Continuity in Supporting Learning. IARTEM e-journal 2010 Vol. 3 (2) Mike Horsley, Bruce Knight & Helen Huntly 43-61

Hung Ta, Wu & Shu Hua, Chen. (2007). Share the Experiences of Instructing Sciences Fair in The community of Insufficient Resource. Proceeding of the 2nd NICE Symposium.

Joyce, C. (2006). Predict, Observe, Explain (POE).http://arb.nzcer.org.nz/strategies/POE.php. 6/10/2013

Keeratichamroen,W. (2007). Using the Predict–Observe–Explain (POE) to Promote students’ learning of tapioca bomb And chemical reactions. Journal.http://www.il.mahidol.ac.th/english_site/research/proceeding/ICASE_wasana%20Keeratichamroen.pdf. 7/20/2013.

Libman, Z. (2010). Integrating Real-Life Data Analysis Teaching Descriptive Statistic: A Constructivist Approach. Journal of Statistic Education, Vol. 18, (1).

Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Mundilarto. (2005). Pendekatan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Sains. PPM Terpadu SMPN 2 Mlati. Yogyakarta: 20 Agustus 2005

Ozdemir, H, Bag, H, & Bilen, K. (2011). Effect of Laboratory Activities Designed Based on Prediction, Observation, Explanation (POE) Strategy on Pre Service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Acid-Base Subject. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science: 169-174.

Rahayu, S, Widodo AT, Sudarmin. (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model POE Berbantuan Media “I Am A Scientist”. Jurnal. Semarang: Prodi Pendidikan IPA, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang

McCartney, W. R and Wadsworth, D. D. E. (2012). Middle School Students with Exceptional Learning Needs Investigate the Use of Visuals for Learning Science. Journal Teaching & Learning (2012) 7(1): 1-20

Rukmana, H. G. T. (2013) Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Disertai Teknik Roundhouse Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas XI-IPA III SMA N 1 Teras Boyolali Tahun Ajaran 2011/2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Vol. 5, No (1) :26 – 33.

Provasnik S, Kastberg D, Ferraro D, Lemanski N, Roey S, & Jenkins F. (2012). Highlights From TIMSS 2011 Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth and Eighth-Grade Students In an International Context.http://www.cde.state.co.us/ assessment/documents/newsreleases/ 2012/HighlightsFromTIMSS2011Math And Science-IES-USDOE.pdf 6/10/2013.

Rustaman N.Y., Dirjosoemarto, S., Yudianto, S.A., Ahmad, Y., Subekti, R., Rochintaniawati, D., dan Nurjani, M. K. (2005). Strategi Mengajar Biologi. Bandung. UPI Press

Sajidan. (2012). Penerapan Model Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru SMA Melalui Pengembangan Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP). (Draf Artikel Penelitian Tidak Dipublikasikan: Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta)

Semiawan, C. R. (1992). Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta: Gramedia

Siahaan, P & Suyana, I. (2010). Hakekat Sains dan Pembelajarannya (Disampaikan dalam pelatihan guru MIPA Papua Barat tahun 2010). Bandung: Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPAUPI.

Siregar, E. & Nara, H. (2010). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Strakey, L. (2004). Critical Thinking Skills Success In 20 Minutes A Day. the United States by LearningExpress, LLC, New York

Suciati, Sudarisman. (2010). Implementasi Pendekatan Kontekstual Dengan Variasi Metode Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Biologi [Online Version]. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati S, & Rustaman A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora

Trilling, B. & Hood, P. (1999). Learning, Technology, and Education Reform in the Knowledge Age or "We're Wired, Webbed, and Windowed, Now What"? Educational Technology, May-June 1999.

Refbacks