KAJIAN EKSISTENSI DINASTI POLITIK TERHADAP PERFORMA INDIKATOR SOSIAL EKONOMI KABUPATEN KLATEN

Zelika Dewi F., Bhimo Rizky Samudro

Abstract


For almost twenty years Klaten Regency is led by a political dynasty, where two couples alternately lead the regency. The problem of the political dynasty will certainly have an impact on the expectation of decentralization, which is to improve the quality of social economy and governance in every region. Similarly, the political dynasty in Klaten Regency. The indicator performance of the social economy in the Klaten Regency can be disrupted by the existence of a political dynasty. Socio-economic indicators consist of GRDP, per capita income, economic growth, inflation, HDI, poverty, corruption, income inequality, and unemployment. The purpose of this study was to examine the pattern of a political dynasty in the Klaten Regency and the performance of the indicator of social economy in this regency. This study was qualitative research by using the interview technique of collecting data and literature review. Based on the result of the content analysis, it showed that the political dynasty in Klaten Regency is a single type of elite political dynasty, quasi familism, and populist typology. Besides, the pattern of social-economic indicator performance is also found, where corruption and income inequality becomes an indicator with the worst performance. The improvement of the political system at the central and local level, review of Article 7r Law number 8 the Year 2015, and political education to society needs to be improved. Besides, the participation of society and law enforcement to keep control of the wheel of government can be expected to reduce fraudulent practices in government, especially in the political dynasty government.

Keywords: Political Dynasty, Political Economics, Social Economy Indicators, Local Strongman Theory


JEL Classification: P16, P48, B55


Keywords


Political Dynasty, Political Economics, Social Economy Indicators, Local Strongman Theory

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Agustino, L. (2011). Sisi Gelap Otonomi Daerah: Sisi Gelap Desentralisasi di Indonesia Berbanding Era Sentralisasi. Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.

Bungin, B. (2008). Penelitian Kualitatif:Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Djati, W. R. (2013). Revivalisme Kekuatan Familisme dalam Demokrasi: Dinasti Politik di Aras Lokal. Jurnal Sosiologi Masyrakat, 18(2), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v18i2.3726

Hofman, B., & Kaiser, K. (2002). The Making of the Big Bang and its Aftermath: A Political Economy. Can Decentralization Help Rebuild Indonesia? Atlanta, Georgia.

Indiarto, N., & Supomo, B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian (Edisi 1). Yogyakarta: BPPFE Yogyakarta.

Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L. J., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2016). Political Dynasties and Poverty: Evidence of Linkages in the Phippines. Oxford Development Studies, 44(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1169264

Nazir, M. (1985). Metode Penelitan. Bandung: Grafika Indonesia.

Samudro, B. R. (2010). Political Economy of Uneven Regional Development and Local Election in Indonesia. 10th International Conference Indonesian Regional Science Association. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1686608

Santoso, S. (2004). SPSS versi 10 Mengolah Data Statistik Secara Profesional. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo Gramedia.

Sitepu, N. S. (1994). Analisis Regresi dan Korelasi. Bandung: Unit Pelayanan Statistika FPMIPA, Universitas Padjajaran.

Sujarwoto. (2015). Desentralisasi, Dinasti politik dan Kemiskinan. Jurnal Ilmiah Adminstrasi Publik, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2015.001.02.1

Yustika, A. E. (2009). Ekonomi Politik: Kajian Teoritis dan Analisis Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 DINAMIKA: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan

Flag Counter

View My Stats