PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT LUNAK ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL DAN ANGKET

Annur Indra Kusumadani, Baskoro Adi Prayitno, Bowo Sugiharto

Abstract

The research is aimed to developing an items test and questionnaire analysis software in order that facilitate students of Biology Education Department, Sebelas Maret University who are conducting research in schools to analyzing the items test and questionnaire. The software is AN Soft 1.0 that has functions to facilitate the user in analyzing the items test and questionnaire. The software is based on Microsoft Visual Foxpro 9.0 with Microsoft Office 2007 and 2010 as controllers. The research is belonged to Research and Development Method (R & D) (Borg, WR and Gall, MD, 1989) with the following research stages. Research and initial data collection, planning, making the initial product, the initial product test, the initial product improvements, field test, operational and product improvements. The research involves the following trial subjects. (1) The initial test involving an educational expert, visual communication expert, and information technology expert. (2) The small trial group involves 30 students of Biology Education Department, Sebelas Maret University. (3) The large trial group involves 50 students of Biology Education Department, Sebelas Maret University. The data was analyzed using qualitative descriptive approach that describes and interprets the qualitative data. Before the data was analyzed, carried out the quantification of data from the questionnaires and the assessment form then the data was analyzed qualitatively. The interviews data was analyzed qualitatively. The results of field test 1 and 2 showed that there is an increasing percentage of the total score from all aspects. The results of the questionnaire showed that the rate of interesting on AN Soft 1.0 users increased from 85.33% to 89.8% is classified as very strong, the ease of installing Soft AN 1.0 increased from 84.33% to 94.2% is classified as very strong, The ease of operations AN Soft 1.0 increased from 84% to 93.4% is classified as very strong, and the mastery level of AN Soft 1.0 users increased from 81% to 90.6% which is classified as very strong. Based on the results, it was concluded the developing of items test and questionnaire analysis software product can be facilitating users to analysis items test and questionnaire in accordance with the rules of proper instruments analysis.

Keywords: The Items Test and Questionnaire Analysis software, Information and Communication Technology, Instrument Assessment, and Evaluation.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, California: Brookd/Cole Publishing Company.

Aldwin, C. M. & Revenson, T. A. (1987). Does Coping Help? A Reexamination of the Relation between Coping and Mental Health, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp. 337-348.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Arikunto, S. (1995). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, S. (1997). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Edisi III. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2003). Tes Prestasi Fungsi dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar. Edisi II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2009). Efek seleksi aitem berdasar daya diskriminan terhadap reliabilitas skor tes, Buletin Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Vol. XVII, No. 1, hal. 28­32.

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Edisi II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on Formatif and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. Mc. Graw: Hill Book Company.

Borg, W. R. and Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction. London: Longman, Inc.

Borg, W. R. and Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research. New York: Longman.

Budiyono. (2009). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS.

Crocker, L., Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Forth Worth: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, INC.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychological Testing. History, Principles, and Applications. Fifth edition. USA: Omegatype Typography, Inc.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212­218.

Linn, R. L, Groundlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and Assessment In Teaching. Eighth edition. New Jersey: Merril an imprint of Prentice Hall.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219­225.

Riduwan. (2011). Belajar Mudah Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sax, G. (1980). Principles of educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Soenarto. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Pengembangan untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Direktorat Ketenagaan, Padang dan Mataram.

Sudjiono, A. (2005). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sutopo, A. H. (2002). Pengantar Grafika Komputer. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Sutopo, A. H. (2003). Multimedia Interaktif dengan Flash. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sutopo, A. H. (2012). Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Widodo, A. (2005). Taksonomi Tujuan Pembelajaran. Didaktis, 4(2), 61-69.

Widodo. A. (2006). Revisi Taksonomi Bloom dan Pengembangan Butir Soal. Buletin Puspendik, 3(2), 18­29.

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yen, W. M. (1992). “Item Response Theory”. dalam Alkin M. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Educational Research (pp. 657­666). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.