Analisis Kebutuhan Siswa Terhadap Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Berbasis Scientific Reading Based Project untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains

Ning Dainty Restiani; Kartika Chrysti Suryandari; Moh. Salimi

doi:10.20961/shes.v8i3.107394

Analisis Kebutuhan Siswa Terhadap Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Berbasis Scientific Reading Based Project untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains

Ning Dainty Restiani, Kartika Chrysti Suryandari, Moh. Salimi

Abstract

Science literacy is one of the essential competencies of the 21st century that needs to be instilled since elementary school level. However, the facts on the ground show that students' science literacy is still relatively low due to limited learning media and lack of age-appropriate scientific readings. This study aims to analyze the need for developing an electronic module based on the Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP) that can support the improvement of science literacy. The method used is descriptive qualitative with instruments in the form of questionnaires and interviews with fifth grade students from three elementary schools. Data were analyzed based on six aspects of needs, namely: learning materials, student involvement, methods and media, scientific reading, technology, and evaluation. The results of the study show that the aspects of the need for scientific reading, the use of technology, and the development of project-based teaching materials received a high response. On the other hand, active student participation and the use of learning media are still limited. These findings provide a strong basis for designing an electronic SRBP module that is contextual, interesting, and in accordance with student needs.

Literasi sains merupakan salah satu kompetensi esensial abad ke-21 yang perlu ditanamkan sejak jenjang sekolah dasar. Namun, fakta di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa literasi sains siswa masih tergolong rendah karena keterbatasan media pembelajaran dan kurangnya bacaan ilmiah yang sesuai usia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebutuhan pengembangan modul elektronik berbasis Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP) yang dapat mendukung peningkatan literasi sains. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan instrumen berupa angket dan wawancara terhadap siswa kelas V dari tiga sekolah dasar. Data dianalisis berdasarkan enam aspek kebutuhan, yaitu: materi pembelajaran, keterlibatan siswa, metode dan media, scientific reading, teknologi, dan evaluasi. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa aspek kebutuhan terhadap bacaan ilmiah, penggunaan teknologi, dan pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis proyek mendapat respon tinggi. Sebaliknya, partisipasi aktif siswa dan penggunaan media pembelajaran masih terbatas. Temuan ini memberikan dasar yang kuat untuk merancang modul elektronik SRBP yang kontekstual, menarik, dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan siswa.

Keywords

literasi sains, scientific reading, e-modul, kebutuhan pembelajaran, sekolah dasar

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aini, R. P. (2024). Menelusuri Media Pembelajaran: Solusi Kreatif Untuk Pembelajaran IPA Di Sekolah Dasar. JURNAL MADINASIKA Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 5(2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.31949/madinasika.v5i2.7689

Baring, J. J. A., & Berame, J. S. (2022). Supporting Conceptual Comprehension of Newton’s Laws of Motion of Grade 8 Students through Kotobee Interactive E-Module. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 4(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i3.18790

Cenic, D., Petrović, J., & Cenić, S. (2019). the Most Important Motivation Factors for Knowledge Acquisition and Successful Learning. Facta Universitatis, Series: Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, 2, 149. https://doi.org/10.22190/futlte1802149c

Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., & Hu, J. (2021). Discrimination of the Contextual Features of Top Performers in Scientific Literacy Using a Machine Learning Approach. Research in Science Education, 51, 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9835-y

Darici, A. (2016). The Importance of Needs Analysis in Materials Development. In Issues in Materials Development (pp. 31–41). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/9789463004329_004

Hafizah, E., & Nurhaliza, S. (2021). Implementasi Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v12i1.9497

Hariyadi, A., & Yanti, D. R. (2019). The Importance Of Needs Analysis In Materials Development. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 4(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v4i2.88

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes. In Cambridge Language Teaching Library. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511733031

Kumalasani, M. P., & Eilmelda, Y. (2022). Analisis Efektivitas Penggunaan E-Modul Berbasis Aplikasi Flipbook Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Di SD. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar (JP2SD), 10(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.22219/jp2sd.v10i1.20175

Kumar, V., & Birla, S. K. C. (2024). Reimagining Scientific Literacy : A Framework for Future-Focused Science Education. Research Square, 1(3), 1–19.

Limiansih, K., Sulistyani, N., & Melissa, M. M. (2024). Persepsi Guru SMP terhadap Literasi Sains dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran Sains di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(3), 723–731. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.37630/jpm.v14i3.1858

Maisarah, U., & Nirwanto, R. (2024). The Importance of Conducting Need Analysis to Design English Courses in Curriculum Merdeka. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nasional (JIPNAS), 2(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.59435/jipnas.v2i1.54

Mhlanga, D. (2024). Digital transformation of education, the limitations and prospects of introducing the fourth industrial revolution asynchronous online learning in emerging markets. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00115-9

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020

Nayak, A., Satpathy, I., & Jain, V. (2024). The Project-Based Learning Approach (PBL): Enthralling students through Project-Based Learning Approach (PBL) in education 5.0. Preconceptions of Policies, Strategies, and Challenges in Education 5.0, 158–174. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3041-8.ch010

OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Publishing. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en

OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. In PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pinasti, D. W., Hartinah, S., & Nafiati, D. A. (2025). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Berbasis Socio Scientific Issues (SSI) Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Pancasakti: Science Education Journal, 10(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v10i1.237

Poedjiastutie, D., & Oliver, R. (2017). Exploring Students’ Learning Needs: Expectation and Challenges. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 124. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p124

Puspitasari, A. D. (2019). Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Modul Cetak dan Modul Elektronik Pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v7i1.7155

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.

Suryandari, K. C. (2019). Model Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP). Widya Sari Press.

Techakosit, S., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Connectivism Learning Environment in Augmented Reality Science Laboratory to Enhance Scientific Literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(2), 2108–2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.009

Triwiyanto, T. (2022). Manajemen Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.

Ummah, M., Rusilowati, A., & Yulianti, I. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Literasi Sains Materi Gelombang Cahaya. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 7(3), 51–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v7i3.27676

Wang, C., Zhang, M., Sesunan, A., & Yolanda, L. (2023). Technology-Driven Education Reform in Indonesia: a look into the crurrent status of the Merdeka Belajar Program. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/30538

Woo, S. E., O’Boyle, E. H., & Spector, P. E. (2017). Best practices in developing, conducting, and evaluating inductive research. Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v8i3.107394